PBUS vs. IVV
PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 12.60%/yr vs 13.13%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
PBUS vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PBUS having a 8.10% return and IVV slightly higher at 8.20%.
PBUS
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 12.60%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 23.72%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.58%
PBUS vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 8.10% | 17.58% | 24.99% | 27.33% | -19.64% | 26.77% | 21.75% | 31.60% | -4.77% | 7.13% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.20% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 7.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PBUS and IVV is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PBUS and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.89 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PBUS vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PBUS
IVV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PBUS
IVV
Financial Services
PBUS
IVV
Communication Services
PBUS
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
PBUS
IVV
Healthcare
PBUS
IVV
Industrials
PBUS
IVV
Consumer Defensive
PBUS
IVV
Energy
PBUS
IVV
Utilities
PBUS
IVV
Real Estate
PBUS
IVV
Basic Materials
PBUS
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PBUS vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
PBUS
IVV
PBUS vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PBUS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.35 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.68 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 11.98 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PBUS vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PBUS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -55.25% | +22.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.89% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -18.75% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.40% | -24.53% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.08% | -3.14% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.11% | -10.76% | +5.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.99% | +0.07% |
Volatility
PBUS vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 5.01% and 4.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PBUS | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.88% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | 9.85% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 12.48% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 16.98% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 18.07% | +1.27% |
PBUS vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PBUS vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than IVV's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.11% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF | 1.04% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 0.98% | 1.35% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, PBUS and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PBUS has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to IVV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.13% vs 12.60% for PBUS. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 12.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for PBUS.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.04% for PBUS.
PBUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PBUS and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer