PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. LVHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLAX vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLAX vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
3.14%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-12.02%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
6.93%7.50%10.18%-0.95%-1.82%26.90%-1.28%22.91%1.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.93% return.


FLAX

1D
3.31%
1M
-9.20%
YTD
3.14%
6M
7.81%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*

LVHD

1D
0.34%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
6.93%
6M
4.97%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
7.59%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLAX vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLAX vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHD
LVHD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LVHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAXLVHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

0.62

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

0.94

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.12

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.02

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.05

3.64

+6.41

FLAX vs. LVHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the LVHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and LVHD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAXLVHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

0.62

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.59

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.57

-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and LVHD is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLAX vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than LVHD's 3.19% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
2.30%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%
LVHD
Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF
3.19%3.35%4.23%3.55%3.30%2.56%3.27%3.30%3.82%3.33%2.48%

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and LVHD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAXLVHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-37.32%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-8.52%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.07%

-16.75%

-22.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.12%

-4.66%

-5.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.70%

-4.05%

-11.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.47%

+0.85%

Volatility

FLAX vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLAXLVHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

2.83%

+7.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.21%

6.53%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

12.07%

+7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

12.87%

+5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

15.50%

+4.25%