PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. FDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAX vs. FDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 30.76% return, which is significantly higher than FDD's 11.53% return.


FLAX

1D
0.88%
1M
11.53%
YTD
30.76%
6M
33.55%
1Y
61.25%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAX vs. FDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
30.76%33.72%9.82%6.27%-18.88%-3.54%24.17%17.19%-12.02%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and FDD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.58

The correlation between FLAX and FDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAX vs. FDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLAX
FDD

Technology

39.7%

-

Financial Services

17.2%
52.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
12.3%

Industrials

9.2%
12.5%

Communication Services

6.5%
2.1%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.9%

Healthcare

3.3%

-

Energy

3.0%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

2.1%
6.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
3.5%

Technology

FLAX
39.7%
FDD

-

Financial Services

FLAX
17.2%
FDD
52.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAX
10.2%
FDD
12.3%

Industrials

FLAX
9.2%
FDD
12.5%

Communication Services

FLAX
6.5%
FDD
2.1%

Basic Materials

FLAX
4.2%
FDD
2.9%

Healthcare

FLAX
3.3%
FDD

-

Energy

FLAX
3.0%
FDD
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

FLAX
2.8%
FDD
3.7%

Utilities

FLAX
2.1%
FDD
6.0%

Real Estate

FLAX
2.0%
FDD
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAX vs. FDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAX vs. FDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAXFDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.24

2.16

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.20

2.98

+1.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.37

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.81

3.53

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.00

11.86

+7.13

FLAX vs. FDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the FDD Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and FDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAXFDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24

2.16

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.60

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.10

+0.36

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. FDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum FDD drawdown of -74.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and FDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAXFDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.51%

-74.77%

+32.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-9.39%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-13.06%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.75%

-35.11%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.26%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-35.47%

+20.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.79%

+0.50%

Volatility

FLAX vs. FDD - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) at 5.22%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAXFDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

5.22%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

12.35%

+4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

15.43%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

18.39%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

20.16%

-0.23%

FLAX vs. FDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FDD's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAX vs. FDD - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than FDD's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
1.81%2.37%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.38%1.57%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAX and FDD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAX has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to FDD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs FDD's -74.77%.

On 5-year performance, FDD leads with 11.03% vs 8.35% for FLAX. On fees, FLAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDD has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.81% for FLAX.

FLAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FDD is Europe Equities. FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLAX and 0.58% for FDD.

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAX and FDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer