PortfoliosLab logo
FLAX vs. VGT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and VGT is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FLAX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FLAX:

0.49

VGT:

0.39

Sortino Ratio

FLAX:

0.86

VGT:

0.73

Omega Ratio

FLAX:

1.11

VGT:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

FLAX:

0.36

VGT:

0.43

Martin Ratio

FLAX:

1.40

VGT:

1.39

Ulcer Index

FLAX:

7.25%

VGT:

8.33%

Daily Std Dev

FLAX:

19.99%

VGT:

29.76%

Max Drawdown

FLAX:

-42.51%

VGT:

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

FLAX:

-15.89%

VGT:

-11.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -8.02% return.


FLAX

YTD

5.71%

1M

8.91%

6M

1.10%

1Y

9.68%

5Y*

6.57%

10Y*

N/A

VGT

YTD

-8.02%

1M

7.01%

6M

-8.30%

1Y

11.53%

5Y*

18.78%

10Y*

19.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLAX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FLAX vs. VGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLAX is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLAX is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLAX is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLAX is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLAX is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLAX is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VGT is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VGT is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VGT is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VGT is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VGT is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VGT is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FLAX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FLAX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than VGT's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FLAX
Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
2.96%3.12%2.20%2.86%2.39%1.58%2.23%2.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.56%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%1.12%

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FLAX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...