FLAX vs. BBAX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLAX (Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF) and BBAX (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - FLAX tracks the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index while BBAX tracks the Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAX returned 7.64%/yr vs 6.75%/yr for BBAX. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

FLAX vs. BBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than BBAX's 15.03% return.

FLAX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.44%
• 6M: 10.05%
• YTD: 18.15%
• 1Y: 36.17%
• 3Y*: 19.41%
• 5Y*: 7.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.17%

BBAX

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 6.08%
• 6M: 7.30%
• YTD: 15.03%
• 1Y: 21.39%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	$14.49M	$15.50M	$15.90M
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	$277.41K	$240.23K	$339.94K

FLAX vs. BBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	18.15%	33.72%	9.82%	6.27%	-18.88%	-3.54%	24.17%	17.19%	-10.62%
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	15.03%	20.21%	2.50%	5.60%	-4.80%	5.53%	8.02%	18.66%	-9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAX and BBAX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018	0.75

The correlation between FLAX and BBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLAX vs. BBAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLAX	BBAX
Technology	48.1%	0.2%
Financial Services	16.0%	45.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	5.7%
Industrials	7.9%	8.2%
Communication Services	5.6%	2.5%
Basic Materials	3.4%	16.4%
Healthcare	3.0%	4.9%
Energy	2.3%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	3.4%
Utilities	1.8%	3.2%
Real Estate	1.6%	7.6%

Return for Risk

FLAX vs. BBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLAX

FLAX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BBAX

BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 59
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLAX vs. BBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLAX	BBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	1.40	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.98	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	2.34	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.72	6.74	+0.98

FLAX vs. BBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAX and BBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLAX vs. BBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than BBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and BBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLAX	BBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.51%	-39.64%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-9.01%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.29%	-20.12%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.15%	-23.21%	-12.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.35%	-1.35%	-9.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.25%	-7.14%	-8.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.53%	3.12%	+1.41%

Volatility

FLAX vs. BBAX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) has a higher volatility of 8.87% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) at 3.97%. This indicates that FLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLAX	BBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.87%	3.97%	+4.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.67%	12.65%	+9.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.75%	15.08%	+8.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.91%	17.39%	+2.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.39%	19.62%	+0.77%

FLAX vs. BBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLAX and BBAX have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLAX vs. BBAX - Dividend Comparison

FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than BBAX's 3.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAX JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF	3.53%	3.86%	4.13%	4.17%	5.06%	5.47%	2.57%	4.07%	1.36%
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF	2.11%	2.37%	3.12%	2.20%	2.86%	2.38%	1.57%	2.23%	2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLAX and BBAX in my portfolio?

FLAX and BBAX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLAX or BBAX?

FLAX has higher volatility (8.87%) compared to BBAX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAX dropped -42.51% vs BBAX's -39.64%.

Which ETF is better, FLAX or BBAX?

On 5-year performance, FLAX leads with 7.64% vs 6.75% for BBAX. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, BBAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLAX or BBAX?

Over the 5-year period, FLAX has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLAX or BBAX?

FLAX and BBAX have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLAX or BBAX?

BBAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.11% for FLAX.

What is the main difference between FLAX and BBAX?

FLAX tracks FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index, while BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.