FLAX vs. IPAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC).
FLAX and IPAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLAX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both FLAX and IPAC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLAX or IPAC.
Correlation
The correlation between FLAX and IPAC is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Performance
FLAX vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FLAX:
11.61%
IPAC:
7.00%
FLAX:
-2.20%
IPAC:
-0.79%
FLAX:
-1.60%
IPAC:
-0.50%
Returns By Period
FLAX
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
IPAC
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLAX vs. IPAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLAX vs. IPAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLAX
IPAC
FLAX vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FLAX vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison
FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than IPAC's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 2.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLAX vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -2.20%, which is greater than IPAC's maximum drawdown of -0.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and IPAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
FLAX vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...