FLAX vs. IPAC
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC).
FLAX and IPAC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLAX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Asia ex Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 6, 2018. IPAC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both FLAX and IPAC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLAX or IPAC.
Correlation
The correlation between FLAX and IPAC is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLAX vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLAX:
0.48
IPAC:
0.33
FLAX:
0.82
IPAC:
0.60
FLAX:
1.11
IPAC:
1.08
FLAX:
0.33
IPAC:
0.41
FLAX:
1.36
IPAC:
1.31
FLAX:
6.97%
IPAC:
4.86%
FLAX:
19.86%
IPAC:
19.43%
FLAX:
-42.51%
IPAC:
-30.99%
FLAX:
-21.48%
IPAC:
-5.94%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAX achieves a -1.31% return, which is significantly lower than IPAC's 1.47% return.
FLAX
-1.31%
-7.57%
-7.83%
9.08%
5.40%
N/A
IPAC
1.47%
-3.67%
-2.49%
7.14%
8.28%
4.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLAX vs. IPAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLAX vs. IPAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLAX
IPAC
FLAX vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLAX vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison
FLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than IPAC's 3.38% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAX Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.20% | 2.86% | 2.38% | 1.57% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPAC iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | 3.38% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 2.76% | 4.03% | 1.68% | 3.37% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 2.66% | 2.60% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
FLAX vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAX drawdown since its inception was -42.51%, which is greater than IPAC's maximum drawdown of -30.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAX and IPAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLAX vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF (FLAX) is 11.22%, while iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) has a volatility of 12.36%. This indicates that FLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.