PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than MGK's 5.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 13.98%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%

MGK

1D
0.22%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
5.33%
6M
6.21%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
5.33%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and MGK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.84

The correlation between FDIS and MGK shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FDIS vs. MGK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDIS
MGK

Consumer Cyclical

96.7%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
0.4%

Technology

1.0%
56.1%

Industrials

0.9%
1.1%

Communication Services

0.3%
17.3%

Healthcare

0.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
4.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDIS
96.7%
MGK
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

FDIS
1.1%
MGK
0.4%

Technology

FDIS
1.0%
MGK
56.1%

Industrials

FDIS
0.9%
MGK
1.1%

Communication Services

FDIS
0.3%
MGK
17.3%

Healthcare

FDIS
0.1%
MGK
4.5%

Real Estate

FDIS
0.1%
MGK
1.3%

Financial Services

FDIS
0.1%
MGK
4.5%

Basic Materials

FDIS

-

MGK
0.7%

Energy

FDIS

-

MGK

-

Utilities

FDIS

-

MGK
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDISMGKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.24

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.37

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

4.65

-2.41

FDIS vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum MGK drawdown of -48.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-48.43%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-16.85%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-23.36%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-36.01%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-36.01%

-3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.58%

-5.63%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-7.58%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

4.97%

+0.04%

Volatility

FDIS vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) have volatilities of 6.19% and 5.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

5.96%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

13.29%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

16.87%

+1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

22.72%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

21.93%

+0.39%

FDIS vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDIS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FDIS vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than MGK's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.33%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and MGK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to MGK (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs MGK's -48.43%.

On 10-year performance, MGK leads with 18.85% vs 13.98% for FDIS. On fees, MGK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MGK has been the lower-risk option at 5.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MGK has performed better with a 18.85% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FDIS.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.33% for MGK.

FDIS is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MGK is Large Cap Growth Equities. FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index, while MGK tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FDIS and 0.05% for MGK.

MGK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer