PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDIS vs. HAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDIS vs. HAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDIS achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than HAS's 4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FDIS has outperformed HAS with an annualized return of 13.68%, while HAS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.22% annualized return.


FDIS

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
-0.87%
1Y
9.82%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
13.68%

HAS

1D
0.30%
1M
-9.74%
YTD
4.15%
6M
3.56%
1Y
32.40%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
1.54%
10Y*
3.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDIS vs. HAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.65%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
4.15%52.52%14.76%-11.95%-37.93%11.90%-8.42%33.41%-8.20%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FDIS and HAS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.50

The correlation between FDIS and HAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDIS vs. HAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

HAS
HAS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDIS vs. HAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) and Hasbro, Inc. (HAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDISHASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

1.13

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

1.73

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.66

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.00

4.45

-2.45

FDIS vs. HAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDIS Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the HAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDIS and HAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDISHASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.13

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.05

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.10

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.30

+0.31

Drawdowns

FDIS vs. HAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDIS drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum HAS drawdown of -74.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDIS and HAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDISHASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-74.17%

+35.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-19.62%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.43%

-40.27%

+12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.16%

-55.05%

+15.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.16%

-63.84%

+24.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-19.38%

+14.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-24.43%

+16.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

7.30%

-2.37%

Volatility

FDIS vs. HAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) is 5.20%, while Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a volatility of 11.67%. This indicates that FDIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDISHASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

11.67%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.06%

23.53%

-10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

28.82%

-10.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

32.88%

-9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.29%

33.90%

-11.61%

Dividends

FDIS vs. HAS - Dividend Comparison

FDIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than HAS's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
3.33%3.41%5.01%5.48%4.56%2.67%2.91%2.53%3.03%2.44%2.56%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDIS and HAS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAS has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to FDIS (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDIS dropped -39.16% vs HAS's -74.17%.

HAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDIS and HAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer