HAS vs. MSFT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAS (Hasbro, Inc.) and MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) are both stocks. HAS operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while MSFT operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, HAS returned 3.22%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HAS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 4.15% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -11.24% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 3.22%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.

HAS

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -9.74%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 3.56%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 3.22%

MSFT

• 1D: -3.17%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: -11.24%
• 6M: -10.15%
• 1Y: -6.96%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: 25.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAS vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	4.15%	52.52%	14.76%	-11.95%	-37.93%	11.90%	-8.42%	33.41%	-8.20%	19.58%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	-11.24%	15.58%	12.93%	58.19%	-28.02%	52.48%	42.53%	57.56%	20.80%	40.73%

Correlation

The correlation between HAS and MSFT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 1986	0.27

The correlation between HAS and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS HAS : -$2.09 MSFT : $16.79
PS Ratio HAS : 1.86 MSFT : 10.01
Total Revenue (TTM) HAS : $4.81B MSFT : $318.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) HAS : $3.43B MSFT : $217.41B
EBITDA (TTM) HAS : $283.20M MSFT : $200.96B

Return for Risk

HAS vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAS

HAS Risk / Return Rank: 71
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

MSFT

MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 29
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 25
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAS	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	-0.28	+1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	-0.21	+1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.97	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	-0.21	+1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	-0.44	+4.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAS vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAS and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAS	MSFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	-0.28	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.46	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	0.93	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.75	-0.45

Drawdowns

HAS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MSFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAS	MSFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	-69.38%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.62%	-33.91%	+14.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.27%	-33.91%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.05%	-37.15%	-17.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.84%	-37.15%	-26.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.38%	-20.67%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-21.78%	-2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.30%	15.95%	-8.65%

Volatility

HAS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a higher volatility of 11.67% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 9.95%. This indicates that HAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAS	MSFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.67%	9.95%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.53%	22.34%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.82%	25.12%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.88%	26.63%	+6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.90%	27.04%	+6.86%

Dividends

HAS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than MSFT's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	3.33%	3.41%	5.01%	5.48%	4.56%	2.67%	2.91%	2.53%	3.03%	2.44%	2.56%	2.69%
MSFT Microsoft Corporation	0.83%	0.70%	0.73%	0.74%	1.06%	0.68%	0.94%	1.20%	1.69%	1.86%	2.37%	2.33%

Financials

HAS vs. MSFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hasbro, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 749.50M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 270.30M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.0%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 198.40M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAS and MSFT in my portfolio?

HAS and MSFT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAS or MSFT?

HAS has higher volatility (11.67%) compared to MSFT (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAS dropped -74.17% vs MSFT's -69.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.