HAS vs. MSFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAS or MSFT.
Correlation
The correlation between HAS and MSFT is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
HAS vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HAS:
0.57
MSFT:
0.90
HAS:
1.05
MSFT:
1.25
HAS:
1.13
MSFT:
1.17
HAS:
0.29
MSFT:
1.15
HAS:
2.32
MSFT:
2.63
HAS:
7.00%
MSFT:
6.78%
HAS:
28.63%
MSFT:
19.82%
HAS:
-74.40%
MSFT:
-69.39%
HAS:
-44.42%
MSFT:
-5.94%
Fundamentals
HAS:
$8.39B
MSFT:
$3.38T
HAS:
-$4.64
MSFT:
$12.10
HAS:
0.68
MSFT:
2.41
HAS:
$4.32B
MSFT:
$254.19B
HAS:
$2.51B
MSFT:
$176.28B
HAS:
-$186.00M
MSFT:
$139.14B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HAS having a 17.00% return and MSFT slightly higher at 17.38%. Over the past 10 years, HAS has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 3.46%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 26.87% annualized return.
HAS
17.00%
-10.94%
0.19%
17.14%
-8.15%
3.46%
MSFT
17.38%
2.36%
-2.89%
18.00%
23.64%
26.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAS vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAS vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than MSFT's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 4.91% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.70% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.48% | 2.59% |
Drawdowns
HAS vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAS vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 5.74%. This indicates that HAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HAS vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hasbro, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities