HAS vs. ATEN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN).

Performance

HAS vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HAS vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	14.93%	52.52%	14.76%	-11.95%	-37.93%	11.90%	-8.42%	33.41%	-8.20%	19.58%
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	31.08%	-2.59%	42.08%	-19.43%	1.70%	68.66%	43.52%	10.10%	-19.17%	-7.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HAS : $13.35B ATEN : $1.68B
EPS HAS : -$2.28 ATEN : $0.58
PS Ratio HAS : 2.82 ATEN : 5.80
PB Ratio HAS : 23.60 ATEN : 7.94
Total Revenue (TTM) HAS : $4.70B ATEN : $290.56M
Gross Profit (TTM) HAS : $3.34B ATEN : $230.52M
EBITDA (TTM) HAS : $175.70M ATEN : $63.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 31.08% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has underperformed ATEN with an annualized return of 5.14%, while ATEN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.96% annualized return.

HAS

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 6M: 25.41%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 25.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

ATEN

• 1D: 3.40%
• 1M: 20.04%
• YTD: 31.08%
• 6M: 28.20%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: 20.47%
• 10Y*: 14.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HAS vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAS

HAS Risk / Return Rank: 87
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ATEN

ATEN Risk / Return Rank: 78
ATEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ATEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ATEN Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ATEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ATEN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAS vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAS	ATEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.35	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.98	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.25	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.32	+0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	4.33	+5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAS vs. ATEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ATEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAS and ATEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAS	ATEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.35	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.49	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	0.35	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.08	+0.23

Correlation

The correlation between HAS and ATEN is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HAS vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison

HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than ATEN's 1.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	2.99%	3.41%	5.01%	5.48%	4.56%	2.67%	2.91%	2.53%	3.03%	2.44%	2.56%	2.69%
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc.	1.04%	1.36%	1.30%	1.82%	1.26%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HAS vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum ATEN drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and ATEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAS	ATEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	-78.29%	+4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.11%	-17.26%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.05%	-43.87%	-11.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.84%	-67.32%	+3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.04%	-0.60%	-10.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.48%	-40.84%	+16.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.36%	9.24%	-2.88%

Volatility

HAS vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) is 7.40%, while A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that HAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAS	ATEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	9.39%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.11%	22.77%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.36%	32.28%	+2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.19%	42.24%	-10.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.61%	43.12%	-9.51%

Financials

HAS vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hasbro, Inc. and A10 Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

ATEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.26M and revenue of 80.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.7%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

ATEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 15.06M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 201.60M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

ATEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 9.87M and revenue of 80.36M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.