HAS vs. ATEN
HAS (Hasbro, Inc.) and ATEN (A10 Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. HAS operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while ATEN operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, HAS returned 4.98%/yr vs 14.84%/yr for ATEN. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HAS vs. ATEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly lower than ATEN's 68.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has underperformed ATEN with an annualized return of 4.98%, while ATEN has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.
HAS
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 1Y
- 30.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.36%
ATEN
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- -18.54%
- 6M
- 70.42%
- YTD
- 68.01%
- 1Y
- 68.60%
- 3Y*
- 24.97%
- 5Y*
- 19.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.04M | $43.58M | $38.84M | |
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | $287.94M | $217.60M | $192.53M |
HAS vs. ATEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 16.30% | 52.52% | 14.76% | -11.95% | -37.93% | 11.90% | -8.42% | 33.41% | -8.20% | 19.58% |
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 68.01% | -2.59% | 42.08% | -19.43% | 1.70% | 68.66% | 43.52% | 10.10% | -19.17% | -7.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAS and ATEN is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.24 |
The correlation between HAS and ATEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HAS:
$13.29B
ATEN:
$2.13B
HAS:
$5.57
ATEN:
$0.61
HAS:
16.85
ATEN:
48.29
HAS:
2.69
ATEN:
7.20
HAS:
18.42
ATEN:
9.76
HAS:
$4.97B
ATEN:
$299.42M
HAS:
$3.50B
ATEN:
$237.54M
HAS:
$1.32B
ATEN:
$67.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAS vs. ATEN — Risk / Return Rank
HAS
ATEN
HAS vs. ATEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAS | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 2.56 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 11.45 | -8.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAS vs. ATEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum ATEN drawdown of -78.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and ATEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAS | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.17% | -78.29% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -24.48% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.27% | -32.10% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.05% | -43.87% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.84% | -67.32% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -22.41% | +12.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.41% | -39.80% | +15.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.72% | 5.48% | +5.24% |
Volatility
HAS vs. ATEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) is 12.46%, while A10 Networks, Inc. (ATEN) has a volatility of 13.85%. This indicates that HAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAS | ATEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.46% | 13.85% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.75% | 28.85% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.45% | 34.95% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 42.28% | -9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.05% | 43.27% | -9.22% |
Dividends
HAS vs. ATEN - Dividend Comparison
HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, more than ATEN's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATEN A10 Networks, Inc. | 0.81% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 1.82% | 1.26% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 2.98% | 3.41% | 5.01% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% |
Financials
HAS vs. ATEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hasbro, Inc. and A10 Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAS vs. ATEN - Profitability Comparison
HAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 867.20M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.1%.
ATEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 59.72M and revenue of 75.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.
HAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 252.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.
ATEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.00M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
HAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 160.90M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
ATEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, A10 Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 75.00M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HAS and ATEN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEN has higher volatility (13.85%) compared to HAS (12.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAS dropped -74.17% vs ATEN's -78.29%.
ATEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAS and ATEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer