PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HAS vs. VT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HAS and VT is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

HAS vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-9.27%
8.69%
HAS
VT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HAS:

0.88

VT:

1.74

Sortino Ratio

HAS:

1.50

VT:

2.35

Omega Ratio

HAS:

1.18

VT:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

HAS:

0.44

VT:

2.57

Martin Ratio

HAS:

2.77

VT:

10.24

Ulcer Index

HAS:

8.86%

VT:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

HAS:

28.05%

VT:

12.03%

Max Drawdown

HAS:

-74.40%

VT:

-50.27%

Current Drawdown

HAS:

-44.01%

VT:

-0.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 3.76% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 3.70%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


HAS

YTD

2.70%

1M

0.74%

6M

-8.06%

1Y

17.75%

5Y*

-7.65%

10Y*

3.70%

VT

YTD

3.76%

1M

1.72%

6M

8.55%

1Y

19.98%

5Y*

10.97%

10Y*

9.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HAS vs. VT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HAS is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HAS is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HAS is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HAS is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HAS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HAS is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VT is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VT is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VT is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VT is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VT is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VT is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HAS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HAS, currently valued at 0.88, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.881.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for HAS, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.502.35
The chart of Omega ratio for HAS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for HAS, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.442.57
The chart of Martin ratio for HAS, currently valued at 2.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.7710.24
HAS
VT

The current HAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAS and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.88
1.74
HAS
VT

Dividends

HAS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than VT's 1.88% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
4.88%5.01%5.48%4.56%2.67%2.91%2.53%3.03%2.44%2.56%2.69%3.07%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.88%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%2.44%

Drawdowns

HAS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-44.01%
-0.21%
HAS
VT

Volatility

HAS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.56%. This indicates that HAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.73%
3.56%
HAS
VT
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab