HAS vs. MAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT).

Performance

HAS vs. MAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HAS vs. MAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	14.93%	52.52%	14.76%	-11.95%	-37.93%	11.90%	-8.42%	33.41%	-8.20%	19.58%
MAT Mattel, Inc.	-26.76%	11.90%	-6.09%	5.83%	-17.25%	23.55%	28.78%	35.64%	-35.05%	-41.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HAS : $13.35B MAT : $4.44B
EPS HAS : -$2.28 MAT : $1.25
PS Ratio HAS : 2.82 MAT : 0.86
PB Ratio HAS : 23.60 MAT : 1.72
Total Revenue (TTM) HAS : $4.70B MAT : $5.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) HAS : $3.34B MAT : $2.61B
EBITDA (TTM) HAS : $175.70M MAT : $740.16M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than MAT's -26.76% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has outperformed MAT with an annualized return of 5.14%, while MAT has yielded a comparatively lower -7.52% annualized return.

HAS

• 1D: 4.71%
• 1M: -6.01%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 6M: 25.41%
• 1Y: 57.67%
• 3Y*: 25.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 5.14%

MAT

• 1D: 2.61%
• 1M: -14.28%
• YTD: -26.76%
• 6M: -13.67%
• 1Y: -25.22%
• 3Y*: -7.59%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: -7.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HAS vs. MAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAS

HAS Risk / Return Rank: 87
HAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
HAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
HAS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
HAS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MAT

MAT Risk / Return Rank: 17
MAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
MAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MAT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
MAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
MAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAS vs. MAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAS	MAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-0.53	+2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	-0.41	+2.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.93	+0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	-0.68	+3.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.43	-1.67	+11.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAS vs. MAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the MAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAS and MAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAS	MAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	-0.53	+2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	-0.17	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	-0.18	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.13	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between HAS and MAT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HAS vs. MAT - Dividend Comparison

HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAS Hasbro, Inc.	2.99%	3.41%	5.01%	5.48%	4.56%	2.67%	2.91%	2.53%	3.03%	2.44%	2.56%	2.69%
MAT Mattel, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	5.52%	5.59%

Drawdowns

HAS vs. MAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.17%, smaller than the maximum MAT drawdown of -83.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAS	MAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.17%	-83.68%	+9.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.11%	-36.10%	+16.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.05%	-47.50%	-7.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.84%	-77.44%	+13.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.04%	-63.12%	+52.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.48%	-41.27%	+16.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.36%	14.79%	-8.43%

Volatility

HAS vs. MAT - Volatility Comparison

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) have volatilities of 7.40% and 7.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAS	MAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.40%	7.57%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.11%	37.04%	-17.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.36%	48.06%	-13.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.19%	37.23%	-5.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.61%	41.87%	-8.26%

Financials

HAS vs. MAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hasbro, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.4%.

MAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 810.40M and revenue of 1.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.9%.

HAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 297.50M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

MAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.10M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

HAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 201.60M and revenue of 1.45B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

MAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mattel, Inc. reported a net income of 106.20M and revenue of 1.77B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.