Correlation
The correlation between HAS and MAT is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
HAS vs. MAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAS or MAT.
Performance
HAS vs. MAT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
HAS:
0.47
MAT:
0.12
HAS:
0.84
MAT:
0.58
HAS:
1.11
MAT:
1.08
HAS:
0.27
MAT:
0.11
HAS:
1.10
MAT:
0.63
HAS:
12.53%
MAT:
11.40%
HAS:
36.39%
MAT:
43.49%
HAS:
-74.40%
MAT:
-83.67%
HAS:
-34.60%
MAT:
-52.43%
Fundamentals
HAS:
$9.19B
MAT:
$6.05B
HAS:
$3.03
MAT:
$1.54
HAS:
21.63
MAT:
12.17
HAS:
1.69
MAT:
1.87
HAS:
2.15
MAT:
1.12
HAS:
7.85
MAT:
2.82
HAS:
$4.27B
MAT:
$5.40B
HAS:
$2.83B
MAT:
$2.75B
HAS:
$934.40M
MAT:
$901.07M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly higher than MAT's 5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has outperformed MAT with an annualized return of 2.35%, while MAT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.89% annualized return.
HAS
19.98%
7.46%
2.70%
16.89%
-5.29%
0.79%
2.35%
MAT
5.70%
14.41%
-0.32%
5.10%
-9.10%
13.09%
-1.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAS vs. MAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HAS
MAT
HAS vs. MAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
HAS vs. MAT - Dividend Comparison
HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, while MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 4.26% | 5.01% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 3.07% |
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% | 4.91% |
Drawdowns
HAS vs. MAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, smaller than the maximum MAT drawdown of -83.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MAT.
Loading data...
Volatility
HAS vs. MAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) is 8.27%, while Mattel, Inc. (MAT) has a volatility of 13.38%. This indicates that HAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
HAS vs. MAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hasbro, Inc. and Mattel, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HAS vs. MAT - Profitability Comparison
HAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hasbro, Inc. reported a gross profit of 658.20M and revenue of 887.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.2%.
MAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 408.10M and revenue of 826.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.
HAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hasbro, Inc. reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 887.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.1%.
MAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 826.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
HAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Hasbro, Inc. reported a net income of 98.60M and revenue of 887.10M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
MAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Mattel, Inc. reported a net income of -40.30M and revenue of 826.60M, resulting in a net margin of -4.9%.
HAS vs. MAT - Valuation Comparison
HAS - PE Ratio
The chart displays the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for HAS, comparing it with other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, HAS has a P/E ratio of 21.6. This P/E ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock may be fairly valued relative to its earnings.
MAT - PE Ratio
The chart displays the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for MAT, comparing it with other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, MAT has a P/E ratio of 12.2. This P/E ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock may be fairly valued relative to its earnings.
HAS - PEG Ratio
The chart shows the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio for HAS compared to other companies in the Leisure industry. HAS currently has a PEG ratio of 1.7. This PEG ratio is close to the industry average, suggesting the stock’s valuation is balanced against its growth outlook.
MAT - PEG Ratio
The chart shows the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio for MAT compared to other companies in the Leisure industry. MAT currently has a PEG ratio of 1.9. This PEG ratio is higher than the industry average, which may suggest the stock is overvalued relative to its expected earnings growth.
HAS - PS Ratio
This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for HAS relative to other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, HAS has a P/S ratio of 2.2. This P/S ratio is high relative to other companies in the industry. It could mean the stock is overvalued, or that investors expect strong future growth and profitability.
MAT - PS Ratio
This chart shows the Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio for MAT relative to other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, MAT has a P/S ratio of 1.1. This P/S ratio falls within the average range for the industry, suggesting the stock is fairly valued based on its revenue.
HAS - PB Ratio
The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for HAS in comparison with other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, HAS has a P/B value of 7.9. This P/B ratio is higher than most companies in the industry. It may suggest the stock is overvalued or that investors expect the company to generate high returns on its assets.
MAT - PB Ratio
The chart illustrates the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio for MAT in comparison with other companies in the Leisure industry. Currently, MAT has a P/B value of 2.8. This P/B ratio is in line with the industry average, suggesting the stock is valued fairly in relation to its book value.
User Portfolios with HAS or MAT
Recent discussions
Risk adjusted performance
The sortino calculation generates a ratio per day over the specified period.
Does this mean that the MAR is the minimum acceptable return per day (365)?
Marcus Crahan
New Tickers, Please: SCHN, SMBS, and HIMU
Karl Restall
Risk adjusted performance indexes
Hello:
Over what period are risk adjusted performance indexes calculated in "Stock Comparison" tool?
Thanks
Marcus Crahan