PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HAS vs. MAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HAS and MAT is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

HAS vs. MAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-7.55%
-3.27%
HAS
MAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HAS:

0.79

MAT:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

HAS:

1.37

MAT:

0.41

Omega Ratio

HAS:

1.17

MAT:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

HAS:

0.41

MAT:

0.05

Martin Ratio

HAS:

2.44

MAT:

0.34

Ulcer Index

HAS:

9.02%

MAT:

9.22%

Daily Std Dev

HAS:

27.80%

MAT:

31.71%

Max Drawdown

HAS:

-74.40%

MAT:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

HAS:

-43.17%

MAT:

-52.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAS:

$8.19B

MAT:

$6.26B

EPS

HAS:

-$4.64

MAT:

$1.57

PEG Ratio

HAS:

0.65

MAT:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAS:

$3.03B

MAT:

$3.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAS:

$2.07B

MAT:

$1.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

HAS:

$831.60M

MAT:

$691.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than MAT's 5.25% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has outperformed MAT with an annualized return of 3.80%, while MAT has yielded a comparatively lower -2.14% annualized return.


HAS

YTD

4.26%

1M

2.80%

6M

-9.03%

1Y

18.83%

5Y*

-7.36%

10Y*

3.80%

MAT

YTD

5.25%

1M

3.90%

6M

-4.80%

1Y

1.86%

5Y*

5.05%

10Y*

-2.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HAS vs. MAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HAS is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HAS is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HAS is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HAS is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HAS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HAS is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MAT is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MAT is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MAT is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MAT is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MAT is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MAT is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HAS vs. MAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HAS, currently valued at 0.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.790.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for HAS, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.370.41
The chart of Omega ratio for HAS, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.171.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for HAS, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.410.05
The chart of Martin ratio for HAS, currently valued at 2.44, compared to the broader market-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.002.440.34
HAS
MAT

The current HAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the MAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAS and MAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.79
0.10
HAS
MAT

Dividends

HAS vs. MAT - Dividend Comparison

HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, while MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HAS
Hasbro, Inc.
4.80%5.01%5.48%4.56%2.67%2.91%2.53%3.03%2.44%2.56%2.69%3.07%
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.92%5.52%5.59%4.91%

Drawdowns

HAS vs. MAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, smaller than the maximum MAT drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-43.17%
-52.63%
HAS
MAT

Volatility

HAS vs. MAT - Volatility Comparison

Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) have volatilities of 5.06% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.06%
4.95%
HAS
MAT

Financials

HAS vs. MAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hasbro, Inc. and Mattel, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab