HAS vs. MAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HAS or MAT.
Key characteristics
| HAS | MAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.84% | 0.85% |
| 1Y Return | 5.01% | -0.83% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -9.93% | -2.71% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -5.34% | 11.34% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.63% | -5.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.22 | 0.11 |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.63% | 25.83% |
| Max Drawdown | -74.40% | -81.65% |
| Current Drawdown | -40.70% | -51.67% |
Fundamentals
| HAS | MAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.37B | $6.42B |
| EPS | -$10.15 | $0.82 |
| PE Ratio | 18.82 | 22.76 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.78 | 1.22 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.76B | $5.44B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.92B | $2.49B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $673.20M | $879.25M |
Correlation
The correlation between HAS and MAT is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HAS vs. MAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, HAS achieves a 24.84% return, which is significantly higher than MAT's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, HAS has outperformed MAT with an annualized return of 4.63%, while MAT has yielded a comparatively lower -5.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HAS vs. MAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HAS vs. MAT - Dividend Comparison
HAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while MAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAS Hasbro, Inc. | 4.50% | 5.48% | 4.56% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 2.53% | 3.03% | 2.44% | 2.56% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
MAT Mattel, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 5.52% | 5.59% | 4.91% | 3.03% |
Drawdowns
HAS vs. MAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAS drawdown since its inception was -74.40%, smaller than the maximum MAT drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAS and MAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HAS vs. MAT - Volatility Comparison
Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Mattel, Inc. (MAT) at 6.69%. This indicates that HAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
HAS vs. MAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hasbro, Inc. and Mattel, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities