FCBC vs. ET
FCBC (First Community Bankshares, Inc.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. FCBC operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, FCBC returned 11.68%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for ET. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FCBC vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCBC achieves a 33.27% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 22.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FCBC has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 11.68%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.
FCBC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 33.27%
- 6M
- 35.35%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.68%
ET
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
FCBC vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCBC First Community Bankshares, Inc. | 33.27% | -12.10% | 15.82% | 13.72% | 5.12% | 60.52% | -27.17% | 1.42% | 14.19% | -2.35% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 22.86% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCBC and ET is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FCBC and ET has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FCBC:
$817.66M
ET:
$67.59B
FCBC:
$2.64
ET:
$1.36
FCBC:
16.27
ET:
14.36
FCBC:
4.74
ET:
0.78
FCBC:
1.57
ET:
1.36
FCBC:
$168.35M
ET:
$89.38B
FCBC:
$117.77M
ET:
$20.48B
FCBC:
$50.67M
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCBC vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
FCBC
ET
FCBC vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCBC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.69 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.77 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 3.90 | -2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCBC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.89 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.36 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
FCBC vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCBC drawdown since its inception was -79.46%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCBC and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCBC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.46% | -87.81% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.43% | -10.02% | -13.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -24.56% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.51% | -25.82% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.53% | -72.82% | +23.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -4.12% | +3.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.48% | -25.75% | -0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 4.55% | +7.27% |
Volatility
FCBC vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) is 5.48%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that FCBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCBC | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.97% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.98% | 11.89% | +7.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.57% | 16.42% | +10.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 24.90% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.87% | 35.04% | -2.17% |
Dividends
FCBC vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
FCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than ET's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.83% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
FCBC First Community Bankshares, Inc. | 5.21% | 9.81% | 2.88% | 3.13% | 3.30% | 3.11% | 4.63% | 3.09% | 4.00% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.90% |
Financials
FCBC vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Community Bankshares, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FCBC vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
FCBC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Community Bankshares, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 37.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
FCBC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Community Bankshares, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 37.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
FCBC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Community Bankshares, Inc. reported a net income of 12.03M and revenue of 37.78M, resulting in a net margin of 31.8%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FCBC and ET have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ET has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to FCBC (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCBC dropped -79.46% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCBC and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer