PortfoliosLab logo
PAA vs. BSM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PAA and BSM is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PAA vs. BSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PAA:

0.34

BSM:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

PAA:

0.51

BSM:

-0.09

Omega Ratio

PAA:

1.07

BSM:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

PAA:

0.16

BSM:

-0.22

Martin Ratio

PAA:

0.91

BSM:

-0.66

Ulcer Index

PAA:

7.42%

BSM:

5.63%

Daily Std Dev

PAA:

28.10%

BSM:

22.26%

Max Drawdown

PAA:

-91.99%

BSM:

-75.58%

Current Drawdown

PAA:

-34.83%

BSM:

-10.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAA:

$12.13B

BSM:

$2.91B

EPS

PAA:

$0.93

BSM:

$0.92

PE Ratio

PAA:

18.55

BSM:

14.95

PEG Ratio

PAA:

2.27

BSM:

1.22

PS Ratio

PAA:

0.24

BSM:

6.84

PB Ratio

PAA:

1.26

BSM:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAA:

$50.14B

BSM:

$437.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAA:

$13.75B

BSM:

$335.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAA:

$2.04B

BSM:

$269.93M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAA achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than BSM's -1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PAA has underperformed BSM with an annualized return of -2.46%, while BSM has yielded a comparatively higher 6.77% annualized return.


PAA

YTD

5.15%

1M

-0.60%

6M

4.54%

1Y

7.22%

5Y*

23.35%

10Y*

-2.46%

BSM

YTD

-1.49%

1M

-4.13%

6M

-5.50%

1Y

-6.80%

5Y*

28.82%

10Y*

6.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PAA vs. BSM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAA is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAA is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAA is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAA is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAA is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSM is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSM is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSM is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSM is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSM is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSM is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PAA vs. BSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the BSM Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAA and BSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PAA vs. BSM - Dividend Comparison

PAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than BSM's 11.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
8.09%7.44%7.06%7.08%7.71%13.11%7.50%5.99%9.45%8.21%11.93%4.97%
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
11.00%10.96%11.90%9.13%7.74%10.18%11.64%8.61%6.69%5.86%2.94%0.00%

Drawdowns

PAA vs. BSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than BSM's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAA and BSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PAA vs. BSM - Volatility Comparison

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 7.27%. This indicates that PAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PAA vs. BSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Black Stone Minerals, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
12.01B
115.25M
(PAA) Total Revenue
(BSM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAA vs. BSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
5.2%
81.4%
(PAA) Gross Margin
(BSM) Gross Margin
PAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 12.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.2%.

BSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a gross profit of 93.78M and revenue of 115.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

PAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 533.00M and revenue of 12.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

BSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported an operating income of 17.16M and revenue of 115.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

PAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 443.00M and revenue of 12.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

BSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a net income of 15.95M and revenue of 115.25M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.