PAA vs. WES

In the year-to-date period, PAA achieves a 9.00% return, which is significantly higher than WES's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PAA has underperformed WES with an annualized return of -2.52%, while WES has yielded a comparatively higher 2.46% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the WES Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAA and WES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than WES's 9.02% yield.

The maximum PAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum WES drawdown of -93.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAA and WES. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) has a higher volatility of 16.45% compared to Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) at 14.03%. This indicates that PAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Western Midstream Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.