ET vs. GEL
ET (Energy Transfer LP) and GEL (Genesis Energy, L.P.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, ET returned 13.14%/yr vs -1.69%/yr for GEL. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ET vs. GEL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than GEL's -0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed GEL with an annualized return of 13.14%, while GEL has yielded a comparatively lower -1.69% annualized return.
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 11.35%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
GEL
- 1D
- -3.38%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- -1.69%
ET vs. GEL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | -0.96% | 61.77% | -8.37% | 19.90% | 1.05% | 84.99% | -66.17% | 22.60% | -9.18% | -32.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ET and GEL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ET and GEL shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ET:
$65.93B
GEL:
$1.85B
ET:
$1.36
GEL:
$0.39
ET:
14.01
GEL:
38.57
ET:
0.76
GEL:
1.10
ET:
1.33
GEL:
3.46
ET:
$89.38B
GEL:
$1.68B
ET:
$20.48B
GEL:
$281.95M
ET:
$13.02B
GEL:
$437.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ET vs. GEL — Risk / Return Rank
ET
GEL
ET vs. GEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ET | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.99 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | -0.33 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.70 | -0.79 | +3.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ET vs. GEL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, roughly equal to the maximum GEL drawdown of -91.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and GEL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ET | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.81% | -91.63% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -17.85% | +8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -31.46% | +6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -38.79% | +12.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.82% | -89.61% | +16.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.47% | -38.19% | +31.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.72% | -34.14% | +8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 7.45% | -2.80% |
Volatility
ET vs. GEL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 5.08%, while Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ET | GEL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 9.38% | -4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 18.98% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 27.84% | -11.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 41.26% | -16.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.99% | 51.19% | -16.20% |
Dividends
ET vs. GEL - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than GEL's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 4.56% | 4.23% | 6.08% | 5.18% | 5.88% | 5.60% | 16.10% | 10.74% | 11.37% | 11.87% | 7.54% | 6.72% |
Financials
ET vs. GEL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Genesis Energy, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ET vs. GEL - Profitability Comparison
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
GEL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 446.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
GEL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported an operating income of 76.61M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.2%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
GEL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genesis Energy, L.P. reported a net income of 19.37M and revenue of 446.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ET and GEL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEL has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs GEL's -91.63%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ET and GEL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer