GEL vs. LITP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GEL (Genesis Energy, L.P.) is a stock, while LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, GEL returned 21.57%/yr vs -5.46%/yr for LITP. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GEL vs. LITP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEL achieves a -6.65% return, which is significantly lower than LITP's 9.54% return.

GEL

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -11.87%
• YTD: -6.65%
• 6M: -8.64%
• 1Y: -10.90%
• 3Y*: 21.57%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: -2.27%

LITP

• 1D: -3.44%
• 1M: -15.71%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 4.35%
• 1Y: 167.73%
• 3Y*: -5.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEL vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P.	-6.65%	61.77%	-8.37%	6.77%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	9.54%	94.65%	-43.85%	-36.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GEL and LITP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.12

The correlation between GEL and LITP shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GEL vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEL

GEL Risk / Return Rank: 22
GEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
GEL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
GEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
GEL Martin Ratio Rank: 11

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 79
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEL vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GEL	LITP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	2.80	-3.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	3.06	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.37	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	5.42	-5.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	14.80	-16.13

GEL vs. LITP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEL Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the LITP Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEL and LITP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GEL vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEL drawdown since its inception was -91.63%, which is greater than LITP's maximum drawdown of -74.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEL and LITP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEL	LITP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.63%	-74.94%	-16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.50%	-31.12%	+8.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.46%	-74.31%	+42.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.75%	-27.35%	-14.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-42.41%	+8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.17%	11.39%	-3.22%

Volatility

GEL vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) is 10.28%, while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a volatility of 17.50%. This indicates that GEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEL	LITP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.28%	17.50%	-7.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.60%	42.23%	-23.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.37%	60.23%	-31.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.21%	47.79%	-6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.23%	47.79%	+3.44%

Dividends

GEL vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison

GEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than LITP's 6.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P.	4.84%	4.23%	6.08%	5.18%	5.88%	5.60%	16.10%	10.74%	11.37%	11.87%	7.54%	6.72%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.76%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEL and LITP in my portfolio?

GEL and LITP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GEL or LITP?

LITP has higher volatility (17.50%) compared to GEL (10.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEL dropped -91.63% vs LITP's -74.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.