GEL vs. LITP
GEL (Genesis Energy, L.P.) is a stock, while LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Over the past 3 years, GEL returned 22.09%/yr vs -13.11%/yr for LITP. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GEL vs. LITP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than LITP's -17.54% return.
GEL
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- 6M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- -5.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.59%
- 10Y*
- -1.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.14%
LITP
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- 6M
- -23.27%
- YTD
- -17.54%
- 1Y
- 63.07%
- 3Y*
- -13.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.74M | $2.69M | $4.59M | |
| $235.50K | $292.96K | $956.89K |
GEL vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 1.55% | 61.77% | -8.37% | 6.77% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | -17.54% | 94.65% | -43.85% | -36.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEL and LITP is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.11 |
The correlation between GEL and LITP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEL vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank
GEL
LITP
GEL vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEL | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.20 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.41 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | 3.81 | -4.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEL vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEL drawdown since its inception was -91.63%, which is greater than LITP's maximum drawdown of -74.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEL and LITP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEL | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.63% | -74.94% | -16.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.19% | -45.50% | +21.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.46% | -70.76% | +39.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.63% | -45.32% | +8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.17% | -42.29% | +8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.41% | 16.84% | -6.43% |
Volatility
GEL vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genesis Energy, L.P. (GEL) is 8.09%, while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that GEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEL | LITP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 10.66% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.66% | 40.49% | -21.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.90% | 58.82% | -30.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.77% | 47.58% | -6.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.17% | 47.58% | +3.59% |
Dividends
GEL vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison
GEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than LITP's 8.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEL Genesis Energy, L.P. | 4.74% | 4.23% | 6.08% | 5.18% | 5.88% | 5.60% | 16.10% | 10.74% | 11.37% | 11.87% | 7.54% | 6.72% |
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 8.98% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GEL and LITP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LITP has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to GEL (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEL dropped -91.63% vs LITP's -74.94%.
LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEL and LITP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer