EQT vs. MNSO
EQT (EQT Corporation) and MNSO (MINISO Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while MNSO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, EQT returned 19.29%/yr vs -8.42%/yr for MNSO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EQT vs. MNSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly higher than MNSO's -28.13% return.
EQT
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- -5.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
MNSO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -28.13%
- 6M
- -31.03%
- 1Y
- -25.72%
- 3Y*
- -5.77%
- 5Y*
- -8.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EQT vs. MNSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.55% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | -14.41% |
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | -28.13% | -18.93% | 20.92% | 93.11% | 6.38% | -60.35% | 8.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and MNSO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
EQT:
$32.47B
MNSO:
$4.03B
EQT:
$5.40
MNSO:
CN¥6.65
EQT:
9.61
MNSO:
13.40
EQT:
0.08
MNSO:
0.08
EQT:
3.21
MNSO:
1.21
EQT:
1.29
MNSO:
2.50
EQT:
$10.03B
MNSO:
CN¥22.58B
EQT:
$6.43B
MNSO:
CN¥10.10B
EQT:
$7.48B
MNSO:
CN¥3.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. MNSO — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
MNSO
EQT vs. MNSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | MNSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.90 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.50 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | -0.94 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. MNSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than MNSO's maximum drawdown of -86.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and MNSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | MNSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -86.58% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.42% | -51.47% | +27.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -54.05% | +22.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | -80.24% | +37.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.32% | -56.44% | +33.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -45.53% | +22.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 27.33% | -15.86% |
Volatility
EQT vs. MNSO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 8.36%, while MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a volatility of 9.60%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | MNSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 9.60% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 23.05% | -1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.56% | 39.85% | -7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.79% | 67.13% | -24.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.90% | 68.59% | -19.69% |
Dividends
EQT vs. MNSO - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than MNSO's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | 5.06% | 3.29% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EQT vs. MNSO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and MINISO Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQT vs. MNSO - Profitability Comparison
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
MNSO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
MNSO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
MNSO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and MNSO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNSO has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to EQT (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs MNSO's -86.58%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and MNSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer