MNSO vs. FXI
MNSO (MINISO Group Holding Limited) is a stock, while FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, MNSO returned -6.99%/yr vs -3.18%/yr for FXI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MNSO vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -27.52% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's -7.18% return.
MNSO
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -9.17%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- 1Y
- -19.90%
- 3Y*
- -3.69%
- 5Y*
- -6.99%
- 10Y*
- —
FXI
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -7.18%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- -3.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
MNSO vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | -27.52% | -18.93% | 20.92% | 93.11% | 6.38% | -60.35% | 26.39% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.18% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNSO and FXI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MNSO and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNSO vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
MNSO
FXI
MNSO vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNSO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | 0.10 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | 0.29 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 0.13 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 0.28 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNSO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 0.10 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | -0.10 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.17 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
MNSO vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, which is greater than FXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNSO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.58% | -72.68% | -13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.47% | -15.62% | -35.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.05% | -28.72% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.24% | -54.94% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.08% | -26.91% | -29.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -31.22% | -14.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.12% | 7.22% | +18.90% |
Volatility
MNSO vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a higher volatility of 11.33% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 7.13%. This indicates that MNSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNSO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 7.13% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.24% | 14.35% | +8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.30% | 19.93% | +20.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.20% | 31.68% | +35.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.50% | 27.67% | +40.83% |
Dividends
MNSO vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than FXI's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.60% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited | 5.02% | 3.29% | 2.36% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNSO and FXI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MNSO has higher volatility (11.33%) compared to FXI (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs FXI's -72.68%.
FXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNSO and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer