PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNSO vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNSO vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -26.38% return, which is significantly lower than DECK's 6.87% return.


MNSO

1D
-0.37%
1M
-9.29%
YTD
-26.38%
6M
-30.49%
1Y
-18.68%
3Y*
-3.19%
5Y*
-6.84%
10Y*

DECK

1D
-0.03%
1M
9.82%
YTD
6.87%
6M
20.73%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
28.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNSO vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
-26.38%-18.93%20.92%93.11%6.38%-60.35%26.39%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
6.87%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%9.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and DECK is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2020

0.21

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNSO:

$4.13B

DECK:

$15.68B

EPS

MNSO:

$6.65

DECK:

$6.98

PE Ratio

MNSO:

2.03

DECK:

15.88

PEG Ratio

MNSO:

0.01

DECK:

0.58

PS Ratio

MNSO:

0.18

DECK:

2.97

PB Ratio

MNSO:

0.38

DECK:

6.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNSO:

$22.58B

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNSO:

$10.10B

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNSO:

$3.73B

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNSO vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO
MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNSO vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNSODECKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.47

0.12

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.53

0.53

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.14

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.69

0.30

-0.99

MNSO vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNSODECKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

0.12

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

0.35

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.24

-0.32

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNSODECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.58%

-94.36%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.47%

-35.81%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.05%

-64.35%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.24%

-64.35%

-15.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.39%

-50.34%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.35%

-40.34%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.94%

16.87%

+9.07%

Volatility

MNSO vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is 11.34%, while Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that MNSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNSODECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.34%

12.56%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.20%

31.32%

-8.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.28%

45.24%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.19%

43.96%

+23.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.52%

42.45%

+26.07%

Dividends

MNSO vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, while DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
4.94%3.29%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%

Financials

MNSO vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.65B
1.12B
(MNSO) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNSO vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Deckers Outdoor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
43.3%
57.6%
Portfolio components
MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNSO and DECK have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECK has higher volatility (12.56%) compared to MNSO (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs DECK's -94.36%.

DECK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNSO and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer