PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MNSO vs. ATAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and ATAT is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

MNSO vs. ATAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
32.57%
51.78%
MNSO
ATAT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MNSO:

0.25

ATAT:

1.22

Sortino Ratio

MNSO:

0.82

ATAT:

1.96

Omega Ratio

MNSO:

1.10

ATAT:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

MNSO:

0.27

ATAT:

1.13

Martin Ratio

MNSO:

0.69

ATAT:

5.88

Ulcer Index

MNSO:

22.86%

ATAT:

8.71%

Daily Std Dev

MNSO:

63.12%

ATAT:

42.09%

Max Drawdown

MNSO:

-86.59%

ATAT:

-46.91%

Current Drawdown

MNSO:

-26.39%

ATAT:

-12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MNSO:

$7.36B

ATAT:

$3.56B

EPS

MNSO:

$1.01

ATAT:

$1.15

PE Ratio

MNSO:

23.32

ATAT:

22.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNSO:

$7.76B

ATAT:

$5.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNSO:

$3.39B

ATAT:

$2.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

MNSO:

$1.57B

ATAT:

$1.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly higher than ATAT's -3.87% return.


MNSO

YTD

-1.42%

1M

0.90%

6M

32.57%

1Y

14.81%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ATAT

YTD

-3.87%

1M

-7.65%

6M

51.78%

1Y

46.72%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MNSO vs. ATAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MNSO is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MNSO is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MNSO is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MNSO is 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MNSO is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MNSO is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ATAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ATAT is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ATAT is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ATAT is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ATAT is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ATAT is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ATAT is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MNSO, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.251.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for MNSO, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.821.96
The chart of Omega ratio for MNSO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.101.24
The chart of Calmar ratio for MNSO, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.301.13
The chart of Martin ratio for MNSO, currently valued at 0.69, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.695.88
MNSO
ATAT

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the ATAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and ATAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.25
1.22
MNSO
ATAT

Dividends

MNSO vs. ATAT - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than ATAT's 1.74% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
MNSO
MINISO Group Holding Limited
2.39%2.36%2.02%1.60%1.51%
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
1.74%1.67%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. ATAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than ATAT's maximum drawdown of -46.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and ATAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-17.96%
-12.22%
MNSO
ATAT

Volatility

MNSO vs. ATAT - Volatility Comparison

MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) has a higher volatility of 21.51% compared to Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) at 11.76%. This indicates that MNSO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
21.51%
11.76%
MNSO
ATAT

Financials

MNSO vs. ATAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab