MNSO vs. ATAT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MNSO (MINISO Group Holding Limited) and ATAT (Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MNSO in Specialty Retail, ATAT in Lodging. Over the past 3 years, MNSO returned -3.19%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for ATAT. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MNSO vs. ATAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -26.38% return, which is significantly lower than ATAT's -11.22% return.

MNSO

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -9.29%
• YTD: -26.38%
• 6M: -30.49%
• 1Y: -18.68%
• 3Y*: -3.19%
• 5Y*: -6.84%
• 10Y*: —

ATAT

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -7.87%
• YTD: -11.22%
• 6M: -17.36%
• 1Y: 14.42%
• 3Y*: 27.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNSO vs. ATAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	-26.38%	-18.93%	20.92%	93.11%	51.77%
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited	-11.22%	49.78%	58.43%	-2.92%	39.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and ATAT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2022	0.38

The correlation between MNSO and ATAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MNSO : $4.13B ATAT : $4.85B
EPS MNSO : $6.65 ATAT : $13.15
PE Ratio MNSO : 2.03 ATAT : 2.66
PEG Ratio MNSO : 0.01 ATAT : 0.02
PS Ratio MNSO : 0.18 ATAT : 0.46
PB Ratio MNSO : 0.38 ATAT : 1.32
Total Revenue (TTM) MNSO : $22.58B ATAT : $10.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) MNSO : $10.10B ATAT : $4.63B
EBITDA (TTM) MNSO : $3.73B ATAT : $2.46B

Return for Risk

MNSO vs. ATAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO

MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 23
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 20
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 27

ATAT

ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 52
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.47	0.38	-0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.53	0.83	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.09	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	0.61	-0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.69	1.51	-2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the ATAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and ATAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47	0.38	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.59	-0.67

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. ATAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, which is greater than ATAT's maximum drawdown of -46.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and ATAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.58%	-46.91%	-39.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.47%	-23.27%	-28.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.05%	-30.96%	-23.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.39%	-18.44%	-36.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-20.01%	-25.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.94%	9.43%	+16.51%

Volatility

MNSO vs. ATAT - Volatility Comparison

MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) have volatilities of 11.34% and 11.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.34%	11.17%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.20%	29.13%	-5.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.28%	37.80%	+2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.19%	58.47%	+8.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.52%	58.47%	+10.05%

Dividends

MNSO vs. ATAT - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than ATAT's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited	1.03%	1.98%	1.67%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	4.94%	3.29%	2.36%	2.02%	1.60%	1.51%

Financials

MNSO vs. ATAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 5.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 689.46M and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 5.65B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNSO and ATAT in my portfolio?

MNSO and ATAT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MNSO or ATAT?

MNSO has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to ATAT (11.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNSO dropped -86.58% vs ATAT's -46.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.