MNSO vs. ATAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT).

Performance

MNSO vs. ATAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	-12.80%	-18.93%	20.92%	93.11%	51.77%
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited	-6.24%	49.78%	58.43%	-2.92%	39.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MNSO : $5.10B ATAT : $5.15B
EPS MNSO : $6.93 ATAT : $11.56
PE Ratio MNSO : 2.36 ATAT : 3.19
PEG Ratio MNSO : 0.01 ATAT : 0.02
PS Ratio MNSO : 0.34 ATAT : 0.53
PB Ratio MNSO : 3.38 ATAT : 1.43
Total Revenue (TTM) MNSO : $14.92B ATAT : $9.76B
Gross Profit (TTM) MNSO : $6.74B ATAT : $4.30B
EBITDA (TTM) MNSO : $1.75B ATAT : $2.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNSO achieves a -12.80% return, which is significantly lower than ATAT's -6.24% return.

MNSO

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -5.98%
• YTD: -12.80%
• 6M: -27.46%
• 1Y: -11.81%
• 3Y*: -0.05%
• 5Y*: -5.26%
• 10Y*: —

ATAT

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -4.70%
• YTD: -6.24%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 31.98%
• 3Y*: 14.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MNSO vs. ATAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNSO

MNSO Risk / Return Rank: 31
MNSO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
MNSO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MNSO Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MNSO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MNSO Martin Ratio Rank: 34

ATAT

ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	0.79	-1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	1.37	-1.39
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.16	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	1.36	-1.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.41	3.59	-4.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MNSO vs. ATAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNSO Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the ATAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNSO and ATAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24	0.79	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	0.66	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between MNSO and ATAT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MNSO vs. ATAT - Dividend Comparison

MNSO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than ATAT's 2.11% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MNSO MINISO Group Holding Limited	3.77%	3.29%	2.36%	2.02%	1.60%	1.51%
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited	2.11%	1.98%	1.67%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MNSO vs. ATAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNSO drawdown since its inception was -86.58%, which is greater than ATAT's maximum drawdown of -46.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNSO and ATAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.58%	-46.91%	-39.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.67%	-24.48%	-17.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-83.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.16%	-13.87%	-33.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.16%	-20.32%	-24.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.12%	9.26%	+11.86%

Volatility

MNSO vs. ATAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MINISO Group Holding Limited (MNSO) is 10.25%, while Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that MNSO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MNSO	ATAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	11.98%	-1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.95%	28.57%	-5.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.18%	40.49%	+8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.84%	59.23%	+8.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.28%	59.23%	+10.05%

Financials

MNSO vs. ATAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MINISO Group Holding Limited and Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MNSO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 361.87M and revenue of 809.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.7%.

ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 2.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

MNSO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of 112.99M and revenue of 809.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 542.47M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.

MNSO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MINISO Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 440.54M and revenue of 809.88M, resulting in a net margin of 54.4%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 473.71M and revenue of 2.75B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.