EQT vs. CRWV
EQT (EQT Corporation) and CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) are both stocks. EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, EQT returned 0.80% vs -38.77% for CRWV. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EQT vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQT achieves a -2.44% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's -1.15% return.
EQT
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- 0.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.19%
CRWV
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -26.70%
- 6M
- -27.99%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- -38.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 56.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | $1.86B | $2.07B | $2.93B |
| $422.62M | $409.70M | $396.70M |
EQT vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | -2.44% | 3.37% |
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | -1.15% | 83.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between EQT and CRWV is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.08 |
The correlation between EQT and CRWV shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EQT:
$32.53B
CRWV:
$38.62B
EQT:
$4.55
CRWV:
-$3.27
EQT:
3.51
CRWV:
5.54
EQT:
1.29
CRWV:
7.84
EQT:
$9.29B
CRWV:
$6.23B
EQT:
$6.78B
CRWV:
$4.32B
EQT:
$6.93B
CRWV:
$1.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EQT vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank
EQT
CRWV
EQT vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EQT Corporation (EQT) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EQT | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | -0.69 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | -1.10 | +1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EQT vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQT drawdown since its inception was -91.51%, which is greater than CRWV's maximum drawdown of -64.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQT and CRWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EQT | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.51% | -64.84% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.89% | -56.61% | +28.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.23% | -61.44% | +38.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.34% | -38.40% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.37% | 35.23% | -22.86% |
Volatility
EQT vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EQT Corporation (EQT) is 10.61%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 26.32%. This indicates that EQT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EQT | CRWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 26.32% | -15.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.12% | 66.44% | -45.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 94.77% | -64.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.39% | 111.95% | -69.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 111.95% | -62.97% |
Dividends
EQT vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison
EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Financials
EQT vs. CRWV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EQT Corporation and CoreWeave, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EQT vs. CRWV - Profitability Comparison
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.
CRWV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
CRWV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
CRWV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EQT and CRWV have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWV has higher volatility (26.32%) compared to EQT (10.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQT dropped -91.51% vs CRWV's -64.84%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EQT and CRWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer