CRWV vs. TEM
Compare and contrast key facts about CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM).
Performance
CRWV vs. TEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRWV vs. TEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 9.54% | 79.02% |
TEM Tempus AI, Inc | -20.36% | 23.46% |
Fundamentals
CRWV:
$34.20B
TEM:
$8.20B
CRWV:
-$2.46
TEM:
-$1.41
CRWV:
7.24
TEM:
6.44
CRWV:
10.25
TEM:
16.68
CRWV:
$5.13B
TEM:
$1.27B
CRWV:
$3.68B
TEM:
$885.69M
CRWV:
$1.64B
TEM:
$105.31M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than TEM's -20.36% return.
CRWV
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- -42.77%
- 1Y
- 49.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEM
- 1D
- 4.00%
- 1M
- -11.78%
- YTD
- -20.36%
- 6M
- -46.55%
- 1Y
- -0.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWV vs. TEM — Risk / Return Rank
CRWV
TEM
CRWV vs. TEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRWV | TEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | -0.01 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 0.56 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | -0.04 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | -0.09 | +2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWV | TEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | -0.01 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.09 | +0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWV and TEM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CRWV vs. TEM - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWV nor TEM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CRWV vs. TEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than TEM's maximum drawdown of -58.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and TEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWV | TEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.84% | -58.99% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.84% | -58.96% | -5.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.27% | -54.45% | -2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.68% | -29.84% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.16% | 27.58% | +13.58% |
Volatility
CRWV vs. TEM - Volatility Comparison
CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a higher volatility of 25.10% compared to Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) at 16.28%. This indicates that CRWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRWV | TEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.10% | 16.28% | +8.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.83% | 42.63% | +24.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.18% | 74.68% | +44.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 119.20% | 100.64% | +18.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 119.20% | 100.64% | +18.56% |
Financials
CRWV vs. TEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and Tempus AI, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWV vs. TEM - Profitability Comparison
CRWV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
TEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a gross profit of 329.54M and revenue of 367.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.7%.
CRWV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -89.59M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.
TEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported an operating income of -62.47M and revenue of 367.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.0%.
CRWV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -451.73M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -28.7%.
TEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a net income of -54.17M and revenue of 367.21M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.