PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWV vs. TEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CRWV vs. TEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CRWV vs. TEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
9.54%79.02%
TEM
Tempus AI, Inc
-20.36%23.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRWV:

$34.20B

TEM:

$8.20B

EPS

CRWV:

-$2.46

TEM:

-$1.41

PS Ratio

CRWV:

7.24

TEM:

6.44

PB Ratio

CRWV:

10.25

TEM:

16.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRWV:

$5.13B

TEM:

$1.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRWV:

$3.68B

TEM:

$885.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRWV:

$1.64B

TEM:

$105.31M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than TEM's -20.36% return.


CRWV

1D
1.25%
1M
0.50%
YTD
9.54%
6M
-42.77%
1Y
49.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEM

1D
4.00%
1M
-11.78%
YTD
-20.36%
6M
-46.55%
1Y
-0.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWV vs. TEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TEM
TEM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
TEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEM Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWV vs. TEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Tempus AI, Inc (TEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRWVTEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.44

-0.01

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

0.56

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.06

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

-0.04

+1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.71

-0.09

+2.80

CRWV vs. TEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWV Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the TEM Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWV and TEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRWVTEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

-0.01

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.09

+0.71

Correlation

The correlation between CRWV and TEM is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CRWV vs. TEM - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWV nor TEM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRWV vs. TEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, which is greater than TEM's maximum drawdown of -58.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and TEM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWVTEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-58.99%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.84%

-58.96%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.27%

-54.45%

-2.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.68%

-29.84%

-6.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.16%

27.58%

+13.58%

Volatility

CRWV vs. TEM - Volatility Comparison

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a higher volatility of 25.10% compared to Tempus AI, Inc (TEM) at 16.28%. This indicates that CRWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CRWVTEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.10%

16.28%

+8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.83%

42.63%

+24.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.18%

74.68%

+44.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

119.20%

100.64%

+18.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

119.20%

100.64%

+18.56%

Financials

CRWV vs. TEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and Tempus AI, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
1.57B
367.21M
(CRWV) Total Revenue
(TEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRWV vs. TEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreWeave, Inc. and Tempus AI, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
67.6%
89.7%
Portfolio components
CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a gross profit of 329.54M and revenue of 367.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.7%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -89.59M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

TEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported an operating income of -62.47M and revenue of 367.21M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.0%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -451.73M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -28.7%.

TEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tempus AI, Inc reported a net income of -54.17M and revenue of 367.21M, resulting in a net margin of -14.8%.