CRWV vs. NBIS
CRWV (CoreWeave, Inc.) and NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) are both stocks. CRWV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while NBIS operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past year, CRWV returned -13.31% vs 316.73% for NBIS. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRWV vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 28.33% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 169.69% return.
CRWV
- 1D
- 7.16%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 88.47%
NBIS
- 1D
- 6.19%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 150.96%
- YTD
- 169.69%
- 1Y
- 316.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 298.24%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | $2.29B | $2.08B | $2.86B |
| $4.95B | $4.23B | $4.29B |
CRWV vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc. | 28.33% | 83.62% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 169.69% | 229.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWV and NBIS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025 | 0.69 |
The correlation between CRWV and NBIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CRWV:
$50.14B
NBIS:
$54.18B
CRWV:
-$3.27
NBIS:
$3.08
CRWV:
7.19
NBIS:
69.75
CRWV:
10.18
NBIS:
9.63
CRWV:
$6.23B
NBIS:
$877.90M
CRWV:
$4.32B
NBIS:
$420.60M
CRWV:
$1.89B
NBIS:
-$52.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWV vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank
CRWV
NBIS
CRWV vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWV | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 6.61 | -6.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 14.55 | -14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWV vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and NBIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWV | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -58.27% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.11% | -48.30% | -10.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.94% | -21.26% | -28.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -19.20% | -19.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.04% | 21.89% | +14.15% |
Volatility
CRWV vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) is 36.81%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 47.00%. This indicates that CRWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWV | NBIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.81% | 47.00% | -10.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.13% | 83.49% | -12.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.56% | 113.97% | -15.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.24% | 113.37% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.24% | 113.37% | +0.87% |
Dividends
CRWV vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRWV nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRWV vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWV and NBIS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (47.00%) compared to CRWV (36.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -66.87% vs NBIS's -58.27%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWV and NBIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer