PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWV vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRWV vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -30.77% return.


CRWV

1D
-2.88%
1M
-12.20%
6M
-22.99%
YTD
0.22%
1Y
-31.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
57.56%

PLTR

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.12%
6M
-16.05%
YTD
-30.77%
1Y
-22.29%
3Y*
83.27%
5Y*
41.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
53.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.96B$1.98B$2.88B
$3.87B$4.57B$5.46B

CRWV vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
0.22%83.62%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-30.77%97.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWV and PLTR is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.26

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRWV:

$39.16B

PLTR:

$282.55B

EPS

CRWV:

-$3.27

PLTR:

$0.89

PS Ratio

CRWV:

5.61

PLTR:

60.51

PB Ratio

CRWV:

7.95

PLTR:

37.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRWV:

$6.23B

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRWV:

$4.32B

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRWV:

$1.89B

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWV vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRWV vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRWVPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.96

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.63

-0.46

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.04

-0.87

-0.16

CRWV vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWV Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is comparable to the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWV and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRWV vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWVPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.87%

-84.62%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.11%

-48.22%

-10.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.91%

-40.60%

-20.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.69%

-40.24%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.87%

25.51%

+10.36%

Volatility

CRWV vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a higher volatility of 31.84% compared to Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) at 13.63%. This indicates that CRWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWVPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.84%

13.63%

+18.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.91%

40.52%

+28.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.38%

52.38%

+45.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.24%

65.74%

+47.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.24%

69.46%

+43.78%

Dividends

CRWV vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWV nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRWV vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CoreWeave, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

CRWV vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CoreWeave, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

CRWV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.5%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

CRWV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported an operating income of -144.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.9%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

CRWV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CoreWeave, Inc. reported a net income of -740.00M and revenue of 2.08B, resulting in a net margin of -35.6%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRWV and PLTR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRWV has higher volatility (31.84%) compared to PLTR (13.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -66.87% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

CRWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWV and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer