EFN.TO vs. CLS
EFN.TO (Element Fleet Management Corp.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. EFN.TO operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO returned 10.74%/yr vs 43.72%/yr for CLS. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EFN.TO is traded in CAD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFN.TO achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 27.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 10.74%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.72% annualized return.
EFN.TO
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -13.76%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -26.11%
- 1Y
- -15.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 16.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
CLS
- 1D
- -12.43%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 27.72%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 217.57%
- 3Y*
- 213.38%
- 5Y*
- 118.49%
- 10Y*
- 43.72%
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFN.TO Element Fleet Management Corp. | -25.54% | 26.00% | 37.37% | 19.41% | 46.54% | -1.75% | 22.92% | 63.45% | -23.56% | -21.38% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 27.72% | 205.58% | 242.31% | 154.08% | 8.47% | 36.67% | -4.07% | -10.34% | -9.22% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFN.TO and CLS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.22 |
The correlation between EFN.TO and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFN.TO:
CA$10.64B
CLS:
$43.01B
EFN.TO:
CA$0.73
CLS:
$8.28
EFN.TO:
36.55
CLS:
44.87
EFN.TO:
29.54
CLS:
0.60
EFN.TO:
4.53
CLS:
3.12
EFN.TO:
3.94
CLS:
20.50
EFN.TO:
CA$2.36B
CLS:
$13.81B
EFN.TO:
CA$1.03B
CLS:
$1.60B
EFN.TO:
CA$1.56B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFN.TO vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
EFN.TO
CLS
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFN.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.39 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 6.85 | -7.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 17.25 | -18.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFN.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 3.05 | -3.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 2.11 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.90 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.03%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -79.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFN.TO and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFN.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.03% | -79.25% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.19% | -31.99% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.19% | -54.22% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -54.22% | +23.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.13% | -79.25% | +7.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.31% | -20.76% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -22.37% | +6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 12.67% | -1.21% |
Volatility
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) is 11.74%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.19%. This indicates that EFN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFN.TO | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 27.19% | -15.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 54.63% | -34.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 71.93% | -48.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 56.47% | -32.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 48.61% | -13.69% |
Dividends
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
EFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFN.TO Element Fleet Management Corp. | 2.02% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.49% | 1.62% | 3.91% | 3.16% | 0.80% | 0.19% |
Financials
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFN.TO vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
EFN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 202.63M and revenue of 598.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
EFN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported an operating income of 252.90M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
EFN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a net income of 116.60M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFN.TO and CLS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFN.TO and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer