CLS vs. VRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLS or VRT.
Key characteristics
| CLS | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 59.77% | 97.44% |
| 1Y Return | 328.78% | 528.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 77.59% | 60.03% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 45.89% | 56.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 7.14 | 9.59 |
| Daily Std Dev | 45.95% | 54.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -96.93% | -71.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -44.64% | -3.21% |
Fundamentals
| CLS | VRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.78B | $35.71B |
| EPS | $2.68 | $1.05 |
| PE Ratio | 18.10 | 90.86 |
| PEG Ratio | 19.42 | 0.49 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.33B | $6.98B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $640.30M | $1.62B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $572.40M | $1.25B |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and VRT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLS vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 59.77% return, which is significantly lower than VRT's 97.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLS vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLS vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% |
Drawdowns
CLS vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and VRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLS vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 13.31%, while Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a volatility of 17.11%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLS vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities