PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFN.TO vs. RYTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EFN.TO is traded in CAD, while RYTM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RYTM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFN.TO achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than RYTM's -18.01% return.


EFN.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
-13.76%
YTD
-25.54%
6M
-26.11%
1Y
-15.02%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
16.91%
10Y*
10.74%

RYTM

1D
-1.17%
1M
-8.57%
YTD
-18.01%
6M
-16.66%
1Y
33.08%
3Y*
72.97%
5Y*
40.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
-25.54%26.00%37.37%19.41%46.54%-1.75%22.92%63.45%-23.56%5.92%
RYTM
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
-18.01%82.44%32.24%54.39%212.58%-66.73%27.30%-18.78%0.34%-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between EFN.TO and RYTM is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFN.TO:

CA$10.64B

RYTM:

$5.87B

EPS

EFN.TO:

CA$0.73

RYTM:

-$3.10

PS Ratio

EFN.TO:

4.53

RYTM:

26.15

PB Ratio

EFN.TO:

3.94

RYTM:

716.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$2.36B

RYTM:

$217.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.03B

RYTM:

$194.16M

EBITDA (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.56B

RYTM:

-$182.86M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFN.TO vs. RYTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFN.TO
EFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

RYTM
RYTM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RYTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTM Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFN.TORYTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.17

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.95

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

2.19

-3.63

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the RYTM Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFN.TO and RYTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFN.TORYTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

0.58

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.53

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.20

+0.31

Drawdowns

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.03%, smaller than the maximum RYTM drawdown of -92.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFN.TO and RYTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFN.TORYTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.03%

-92.04%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.19%

-34.97%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-34.97%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-84.72%

+53.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.31%

-25.64%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-31.28%

+15.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.46%

15.11%

-3.65%

Volatility

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) is 11.74%, while Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RYTM) has a volatility of 14.48%. This indicates that EFN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFN.TORYTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

14.48%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

36.45%

-16.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

57.39%

-34.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

75.73%

-52.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.92%

70.24%

-35.32%

Dividends

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Dividend Comparison

EFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while RYTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
2.02%1.44%1.69%1.95%1.81%2.12%1.49%1.62%3.91%3.16%0.80%0.19%
RYTM
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
598.29M
60.11M
(EFN.TO) Total Revenue
(RYTM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EFN.TO values in CAD, RYTM values in USD

EFN.TO vs. RYTM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.9%
88.1%
Portfolio components
EFN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 202.63M and revenue of 598.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

RYTM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.96M and revenue of 60.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.1%.

EFN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported an operating income of 252.90M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.

RYTM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of -52.36M and revenue of 60.11M, resulting in an operating margin of -87.1%.

EFN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a net income of 116.60M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.

RYTM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of -56.74M and revenue of 60.11M, resulting in a net margin of -94.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFN.TO and RYTM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFN.TO and RYTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer