PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFN.TO achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than DOL.TO's -14.16% return. Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO has underperformed DOL.TO with an annualized return of 10.74%, while DOL.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.71% annualized return.


EFN.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
-13.76%
YTD
-25.54%
6M
-26.11%
1Y
-15.02%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
16.91%
10Y*
10.74%

DOL.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
0.78%
YTD
-14.16%
6M
-12.44%
1Y
-0.46%
3Y*
28.23%
5Y*
27.03%
10Y*
19.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
-25.54%26.00%37.37%19.41%46.54%-1.75%22.92%63.45%-23.56%-21.38%
DOL.TO
Dollarama Inc.
-14.16%46.59%47.34%20.96%25.45%22.47%16.69%38.01%-37.77%60.22%

Correlation

The correlation between EFN.TO and DOL.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFN.TO:

CA$10.64B

DOL.TO:

CA$48.28B

EPS

EFN.TO:

CA$0.73

DOL.TO:

CA$4.74

PE Ratio

EFN.TO:

36.55

DOL.TO:

37.11

PEG Ratio

EFN.TO:

29.54

DOL.TO:

1.72

PS Ratio

EFN.TO:

4.53

DOL.TO:

6.70

PB Ratio

EFN.TO:

3.94

DOL.TO:

33.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$2.36B

DOL.TO:

CA$7.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.03B

DOL.TO:

CA$3.13B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.56B

DOL.TO:

CA$2.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFN.TO
EFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

DOL.TO
DOL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DOL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DOL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFN.TODOL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.02

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.02

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

-0.04

-1.39

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the DOL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFN.TO and DOL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFN.TODOL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

-0.01

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

1.27

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.82

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.21

-0.69

Drawdowns

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.03%, which is greater than DOL.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFN.TO and DOL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFN.TODOL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.03%

-45.07%

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.19%

-19.07%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-19.07%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-19.07%

-12.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.13%

-45.07%

-27.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.31%

-14.59%

-14.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-6.51%

-9.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.46%

8.44%

+3.02%

Volatility

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Volatility Comparison

Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Dollarama Inc. (DOL.TO) at 6.10%. This indicates that EFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFN.TODOL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

6.10%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

17.79%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

22.97%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

21.45%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.92%

24.23%

+10.69%

Dividends

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Dividend Comparison

EFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than DOL.TO's 0.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOL.TO
Dollarama Inc.
0.25%0.20%0.25%0.28%0.27%0.31%0.34%0.39%0.48%0.27%0.40%0.44%
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
2.02%1.44%1.69%1.95%1.81%2.12%1.49%1.62%3.91%3.16%0.80%0.19%

Financials

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Dollarama Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
598.29M
2.10B
(EFN.TO) Total Revenue
(DOL.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

EFN.TO vs. DOL.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Dollarama Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.9%
39.8%
Portfolio components
EFN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 202.63M and revenue of 598.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

DOL.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a gross profit of 835.51M and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.8%.

EFN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported an operating income of 252.90M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.

DOL.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported an operating income of 511.68M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

EFN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a net income of 116.60M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.

DOL.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dollarama Inc. reported a net income of 392.46M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFN.TO and DOL.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFN.TO and DOL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer