EFN.TO vs. BN.TO
EFN.TO (Element Fleet Management Corp.) and BN.TO (Brookfield Corporation) are both stocks. EFN.TO operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while BN.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO returned 10.74%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for BN.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EFN.TO achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than BN.TO's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO has underperformed BN.TO with an annualized return of 10.74%, while BN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
EFN.TO
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -13.76%
- YTD
- -25.54%
- 6M
- -26.11%
- 1Y
- -15.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 16.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
BN.TO
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- -2.64%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 31.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFN.TO Element Fleet Management Corp. | -25.54% | 26.00% | 37.37% | 19.41% | 46.54% | -1.75% | 22.92% | 63.45% | -23.56% | -21.38% |
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | -0.42% | 15.10% | 56.51% | 26.33% | -29.85% | 48.12% | 6.93% | 45.72% | -2.63% | 26.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EFN.TO and BN.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.29 |
The correlation between EFN.TO and BN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EFN.TO:
CA$10.64B
BN.TO:
CA$144.27B
EFN.TO:
CA$0.73
BN.TO:
CA$0.63
EFN.TO:
36.55
BN.TO:
100.10
EFN.TO:
4.53
BN.TO:
1.76
EFN.TO:
3.94
BN.TO:
3.38
EFN.TO:
CA$2.36B
BN.TO:
CA$76.56B
EFN.TO:
CA$1.03B
BN.TO:
CA$18.76B
EFN.TO:
CA$1.56B
BN.TO:
CA$33.73B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
EFN.TO
BN.TO
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EFN.TO | BN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 0.86 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.45 | -3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EFN.TO | BN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.69 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.53 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.58 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.03%, smaller than the maximum BN.TO drawdown of -83.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFN.TO and BN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EFN.TO | BN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.03% | -83.06% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.19% | -22.47% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.19% | -28.93% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.19% | -36.23% | +5.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.13% | -46.69% | -25.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.31% | -7.58% | -21.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -20.67% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 7.91% | +3.55% |
Volatility
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) at 9.86%. This indicates that EFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EFN.TO | BN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 9.86% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 21.82% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.27% | 28.32% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 28.93% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.92% | 28.21% | +6.71% |
Dividends
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Dividend Comparison
EFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than BN.TO's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.53% | 0.99% | 2.06% | 1.06% | 1.52% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.43% |
EFN.TO Element Fleet Management Corp. | 2.02% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.49% | 1.62% | 3.91% | 3.16% | 0.80% | 0.19% |
Financials
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Brookfield Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EFN.TO vs. BN.TO - Profitability Comparison
EFN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 202.63M and revenue of 598.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.
BN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 18.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.
EFN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported an operating income of 252.90M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.
BN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.38B and revenue of 18.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
EFN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a net income of 116.60M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
BN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.33M and revenue of 18.35B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EFN.TO and BN.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for EFN.TO and BN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer