CLS vs. FIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX).

Performance

CLS vs. FIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLS vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-16.32%	-11.56%
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc.	47.83%	120.86%	106.89%	79.62%	16.98%	88.98%	6.73%	15.07%	0.73%	32.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLS : $32.65B FIX : $48.70B
EPS CLS : $7.19 FIX : $28.93
PE Ratio CLS : 39.16 FIX : 47.67
PEG Ratio CLS : 0.53 FIX : 0.72
PS Ratio CLS : 2.63 FIX : 5.36
PB Ratio CLS : 14.76 FIX : 19.89
Total Revenue (TTM) CLS : $12.41B FIX : $9.10B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLS : $1.44B FIX : $2.20B
EBITDA (TTM) CLS : $1.21B FIX : $1.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 47.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 38.34%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.46% annualized return.

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

FIX

• 1D: 8.31%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 47.83%
• 6M: 67.30%
• 1Y: 329.03%
• 3Y*: 112.20%
• 5Y*: 79.33%
• 10Y*: 46.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLS vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FIX

FIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLS	FIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	5.97	-2.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	5.33	-2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.74	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.23	23.72	-15.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	80.80	-58.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLS vs. FIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is lower than the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 5.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and FIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLS	FIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	5.97	-2.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.81	1.82	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	1.11	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.38	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and FIX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLS vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLS Celestica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc.	0.16%	0.21%	0.28%	0.41%	0.49%	0.49%	0.81%	0.79%	0.76%	0.68%	0.83%	0.88%

Drawdowns

CLS vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLS	FIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.93%	-93.36%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.24%	-13.77%	-15.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	-46.05%	-7.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.60%	-49.68%	-30.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-6.23%	-13.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-38.30%	-35.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	4.04%	+6.94%

Volatility

CLS vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 23.87% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 20.47%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLS	FIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	20.47%	+3.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.95%	40.82%	+14.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.02%	55.55%	+16.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.73%	43.92%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.76%	42.12%	+6.64%

Financials

CLS vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

FIX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 674.72M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

FIX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 426.74M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

FIX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 330.81M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.