CLS vs. FIX

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 212.30% return, which is significantly higher than FIX's 139.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 23.72%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 4.45, which is comparable to the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and FIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 16.99%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.