CLS vs. FIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLS or FIX.
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and FIX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CLS vs. FIX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLS:
1.28
FIX:
0.47
CLS:
1.90
FIX:
1.02
CLS:
1.27
FIX:
1.15
CLS:
1.95
FIX:
0.68
CLS:
4.95
FIX:
1.66
CLS:
21.28%
FIX:
18.86%
CLS:
75.20%
FIX:
58.62%
CLS:
-96.93%
FIX:
-93.36%
CLS:
-32.95%
FIX:
-20.10%
Fundamentals
CLS:
$10.26B
FIX:
$15.24B
CLS:
$3.58
FIX:
$16.68
CLS:
24.92
FIX:
25.91
CLS:
19.42
FIX:
2.06
CLS:
1.05
FIX:
2.10
CLS:
6.95
FIX:
8.58
CLS:
$10.09B
FIX:
$7.32B
CLS:
$1.07B
FIX:
$1.57B
CLS:
$724.86M
FIX:
$913.69M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly higher than FIX's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 22.67%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.99% annualized return.
CLS
4.37%
39.91%
12.89%
95.28%
75.13%
22.67%
FIX
3.69%
40.66%
-0.72%
27.33%
68.87%
35.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLS vs. FIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLS
FIX
CLS vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLS vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison
CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.31% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.31% |
Drawdowns
CLS vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLS vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 23.21% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 18.98%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CLS vs. FIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CLS vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 273.90M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.3%.
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 403.42M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 128.80M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 209.10M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 86.20M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 169.29M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.