PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLS vs. FIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and FIX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CLS vs. FIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
76.36%
39.58%
CLS
FIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CLS:

4.08

FIX:

2.48

Sortino Ratio

CLS:

3.92

FIX:

2.85

Omega Ratio

CLS:

1.51

FIX:

1.40

Calmar Ratio

CLS:

3.37

FIX:

7.03

Martin Ratio

CLS:

19.96

FIX:

17.41

Ulcer Index

CLS:

11.37%

FIX:

6.37%

Daily Std Dev

CLS:

55.72%

FIX:

44.69%

Max Drawdown

CLS:

-96.93%

FIX:

-93.36%

Current Drawdown

CLS:

-1.68%

FIX:

-13.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS:

$11.40B

FIX:

$16.18B

EPS

CLS:

$3.16

FIX:

$13.09

PE Ratio

CLS:

30.95

FIX:

34.72

PEG Ratio

CLS:

19.42

FIX:

2.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS:

$9.29B

FIX:

$6.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS:

$941.37M

FIX:

$1.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS:

$719.13M

FIX:

$758.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 233.09% return, which is significantly higher than FIX's 113.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 23.59%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.11% annualized return.


CLS

YTD

233.09%

1M

9.39%

6M

74.75%

1Y

227.06%

5Y*

64.52%

10Y*

23.59%

FIX

YTD

113.12%

1M

-11.04%

6M

36.28%

1Y

110.96%

5Y*

54.75%

10Y*

39.11%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLS vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLS, currently valued at 4.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.082.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLS, currently valued at 3.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.922.85
The chart of Omega ratio for CLS, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.511.40
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLS, currently valued at 3.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.377.03
The chart of Martin ratio for CLS, currently valued at 19.96, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0019.9617.41
CLS
FIX

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the FIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and FIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.006.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.08
2.48
CLS
FIX

Dividends

CLS vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.27%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%1.31%1.08%

Drawdowns

CLS vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.68%
-13.35%
CLS
FIX

Volatility

CLS vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 10.54%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
15.91%
10.54%
CLS
FIX

Financials

CLS vs. FIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab