PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLS vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 27.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 44.15%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 15.70% annualized return.


CLS

1D
1.15%
1M
2.58%
YTD
27.48%
6M
22.81%
1Y
178.67%
3Y*
198.00%
5Y*
117.18%
10Y*
44.15%

SPY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLS
Celestica Inc.
27.48%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.74%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and SPY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998

0.51

The correlation between CLS and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLSSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.15

3.01

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

13.54

+1.08

CLS vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLS vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-55.19%

-41.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-8.88%

-20.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.96%

-18.76%

-35.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

-24.50%

-29.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

-33.72%

-46.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.23%

-1.75%

-18.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.28%

-9.04%

-64.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.28%

1.97%

+10.31%

Volatility

CLS vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 26.96% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.96%

4.64%

+22.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.59%

9.75%

+43.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.82%

12.43%

+60.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.76%

17.14%

+40.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.03%

17.99%

+32.04%

Dividends

CLS vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLS and SPY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (26.96%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs SPY's -55.19%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer