CLS vs. NBIS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS).

Performance

CLS vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLS vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	59.63%
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.	23.96%	202.18%	46.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLS : $32.65B NBIS : $26.25B
EPS CLS : $7.19 NBIS : $0.41
PE Ratio CLS : 39.16 NBIS : 253.55
PEG Ratio CLS : 0.53 NBIS : 87.12
PS Ratio CLS : 2.63 NBIS : 48.22
PB Ratio CLS : 14.76 NBIS : 5.69
Total Revenue (TTM) CLS : $12.41B NBIS : $534.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) CLS : $1.44B NBIS : $363.20M
EBITDA (TTM) CLS : $1.21B NBIS : -$276.75M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 23.96% return.

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

NBIS

• 1D: 12.46%
• 1M: 13.78%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 6M: -7.58%
• 1Y: 391.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLS vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

NBIS

NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 96
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLS	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	3.80	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.87	-0.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.44	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.23	8.03	+0.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	18.58	+3.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLS vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is comparable to the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and NBIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLS	NBIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	3.80	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	2.04	-1.79

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and NBIS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CLS vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLS vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and NBIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLS	NBIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.93%	-58.27%	-38.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.24%	-45.47%	+16.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-23.40%	+3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-20.63%	-53.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	19.65%	-8.67%

Volatility

CLS vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 23.87%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 34.88%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLS	NBIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	34.88%	-11.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.95%	68.31%	-13.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.02%	103.94%	-31.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.73%	111.65%	-55.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.76%	111.65%	-62.89%

Financials