PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EFN.TO vs. CP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFN.TO achieves a -25.54% return, which is significantly lower than CP.TO's 23.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EFN.TO has underperformed CP.TO with an annualized return of 10.74%, while CP.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.


EFN.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
-13.76%
YTD
-25.54%
6M
-26.11%
1Y
-15.02%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
16.91%
10Y*
10.74%

CP.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
6.09%
YTD
23.33%
6M
22.52%
1Y
12.11%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
-25.54%26.00%37.37%19.41%46.54%-1.75%22.92%63.45%-23.56%-21.38%
CP.TO
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
23.33%-2.09%-0.05%4.62%12.00%3.91%34.69%38.09%6.58%21.13%

Correlation

The correlation between EFN.TO and CP.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFN.TO:

CA$10.64B

CP.TO:

CA$111.60B

EPS

EFN.TO:

CA$0.73

CP.TO:

CA$4.49

PE Ratio

EFN.TO:

36.55

CP.TO:

27.70

PEG Ratio

EFN.TO:

29.54

CP.TO:

11.64

PS Ratio

EFN.TO:

4.53

CP.TO:

7.54

PB Ratio

EFN.TO:

3.94

CP.TO:

2.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$2.36B

CP.TO:

CA$14.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.03B

CP.TO:

CA$6.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

EFN.TO:

CA$1.56B

CP.TO:

CA$8.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFN.TO
EFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CP.TO
CP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EFN.TOCP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.11

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

0.87

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

1.56

-2.99

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EFN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.71, which is lower than the CP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFN.TO and CP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EFN.TOCP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

0.54

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.26

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.63

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.52

0.00

Drawdowns

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFN.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.03%, which is greater than CP.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFN.TO and CP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EFN.TOCP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.03%

-62.01%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.19%

-13.60%

-17.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.19%

-21.60%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.19%

-21.60%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.13%

-27.38%

-44.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.31%

-1.48%

-27.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-12.80%

-3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.46%

7.58%

+3.88%

Volatility

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Element Fleet Management Corp. (EFN.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Canadian Pacific Railway Limited (CP.TO) at 6.39%. This indicates that EFN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EFN.TOCP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

6.39%

+5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.69%

17.37%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.27%

21.97%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

22.26%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.92%

23.60%

+11.32%

Dividends

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Dividend Comparison

EFN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than CP.TO's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP.TO
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
0.73%0.86%0.73%0.72%0.89%0.84%0.81%0.95%1.04%0.95%0.97%0.79%
EFN.TO
Element Fleet Management Corp.
2.02%1.44%1.69%1.95%1.81%2.12%1.49%1.62%3.91%3.16%0.80%0.19%

Financials

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
598.29M
3.70B
(EFN.TO) Total Revenue
(CP.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

EFN.TO vs. CP.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Element Fleet Management Corp. and Canadian Pacific Railway Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
33.9%
36.8%
Portfolio components
EFN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a gross profit of 202.63M and revenue of 598.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

CP.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

EFN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported an operating income of 252.90M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.3%.

CP.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.2%.

EFN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Element Fleet Management Corp. reported a net income of 116.60M and revenue of 598.29M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.

CP.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited reported a net income of 846.00M and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EFN.TO and CP.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EFN.TO and CP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer