CLS vs. FN

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 30.96% return, which is significantly higher than FN's 2.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 26.47%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 29.85% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.88, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and FN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CLS nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 39.90% compared to Fabrinet (FN) at 28.31%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.