CLS vs. FN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN).

Performance

CLS vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLS vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-16.32%	-11.56%
FN Fabrinet	14.55%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CLS : $32.65B FN : $18.87B
EPS CLS : $7.19 FN : $10.36
PE Ratio CLS : 39.16 FN : 50.35
PEG Ratio CLS : 0.53 FN : 2.16
PS Ratio CLS : 2.63 FN : 4.84
PB Ratio CLS : 14.76 FN : 8.64
Total Revenue (TTM) CLS : $12.41B FN : $3.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) CLS : $1.44B FN : $467.60M
EBITDA (TTM) CLS : $1.21B FN : $458.04M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 14.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed FN with an annualized return of 38.34%, while FN has yielded a comparatively lower 32.12% annualized return.

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

FN

• 1D: 6.03%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: 14.55%
• 6M: 43.03%
• 1Y: 164.05%
• 3Y*: 63.76%
• 5Y*: 41.68%
• 10Y*: 32.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLS vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 93
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLS	FN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	2.53	+1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	2.67	+0.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.37	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.23	8.07	+0.16
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	20.16	+1.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLS vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and FN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLS	FN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	2.53	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.81	0.81	+1.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.68	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.57	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and FN is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CLS vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLS vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and FN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLS	FN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.93%	-70.46%	-26.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.24%	-20.55%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	-38.70%	-15.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.60%	-51.11%	-29.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-15.34%	-4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-22.78%	-51.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	8.23%	+2.75%

Volatility

CLS vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 23.87%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 28.70%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLS	FN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	28.70%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.95%	50.83%	+4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.02%	65.21%	+6.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.73%	51.79%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.76%	47.40%	+1.36%

Financials

CLS vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.57M and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 137.68M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.2%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 325.73M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 114.40M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 271.61M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 112.63M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.