PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 39.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed UMDD with an annualized return of 7.22%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.96% annualized return.


EET

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.70%
6M
9.73%
YTD
27.71%
1Y
64.20%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
4.11%

UMDD

1D
3.16%
1M
-0.95%
6M
22.93%
YTD
39.73%
1Y
60.12%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
10.96%
ALL TIME*
19.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$506.00K$1.40M$1.55M
$270.14K$258.68K$250.88K

EET vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
27.71%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
39.73%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and UMDD is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.66

The correlation between EET and UMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
UMDD

Financial Services

57.7%
13.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Communication Services

-

1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.2%

Energy

-

4.6%

Healthcare

-

9.0%

Industrials

-

25.3%

Real Estate

-

7.2%

Technology

-

17.2%

Utilities

-

2.9%

Financial Services

EET
57.7%
UMDD
13.9%

Basic Materials

EET

-

UMDD
4.8%

Communication Services

EET

-

UMDD
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

UMDD
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

UMDD
3.2%

Energy

EET

-

UMDD
4.6%

Healthcare

EET

-

UMDD
9.0%

Industrials

EET

-

UMDD
25.3%

Real Estate

EET

-

UMDD
7.2%

Technology

EET

-

UMDD
17.2%

Utilities

EET

-

UMDD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EET vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETUMDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.32

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

7.72

-0.88

EET vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and UMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-86.24%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.43%

-26.04%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-60.33%

+25.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.36%

-64.61%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-86.24%

+17.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.80%

-5.06%

-14.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-23.43%

-13.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.42%

7.81%

+1.61%

Volatility

EET vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) at 11.11%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.37%

11.11%

+8.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.06%

35.07%

+9.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.24%

47.12%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.77%

58.72%

-18.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.30%

62.12%

-20.82%

EET vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and UMDD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EET vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than UMDD's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.57%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.67%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and UMDD have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to UMDD (11.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 10.96% vs 7.22% for EET. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UMDD has been the lower-risk option at 11.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET and UMDD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 0.67% for UMDD.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%).

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer