PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 33.73% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 23.91% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 7.71%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.23% annualized return.


EET

1D
0.24%
1M
-6.70%
6M
16.89%
YTD
33.73%
1Y
66.99%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
7.71%
ALL TIME*
4.39%

SPUU

1D
-0.36%
1M
4.55%
6M
22.96%
YTD
23.91%
1Y
43.76%
3Y*
36.03%
5Y*
18.72%
10Y*
24.23%
ALL TIME*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$623.17K$1.18M$1.55M
$5.27M$4.83M$4.60M

EET vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
33.73%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
23.91%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and SPUU is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.67

The correlation between EET and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (10 years) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
SPUU

Financial Services

57.7%
5.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.8%

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.1%

Energy

-

1.5%

Healthcare

-

4.1%

Industrials

-

3.5%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

-

17.0%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Financial Services

EET
57.7%
SPUU
5.5%

Basic Materials

EET

-

SPUU
0.8%

Communication Services

EET

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

SPUU
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

SPUU
2.1%

Energy

EET

-

SPUU
1.5%

Healthcare

EET

-

SPUU
4.1%

Industrials

EET

-

SPUU
3.5%

Real Estate

EET

-

SPUU
0.9%

Technology

EET

-

SPUU
17.0%

Utilities

EET

-

SPUU
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EET vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.42

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

9.75

-2.70

EET vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-59.35%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.43%

-18.19%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-35.18%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.36%

-46.59%

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-59.35%

-9.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.02%

-0.36%

-15.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-9.43%

-27.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.53%

4.50%

+5.03%

Volatility

EET vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.65% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 8.12%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.65%

8.12%

+9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.25%

20.70%

+24.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.29%

25.84%

+23.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.82%

33.76%

+6.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.31%

35.81%

+5.50%

EET vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than SPUU's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.50%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.27%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and SPUU have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (17.65%) compared to SPUU (8.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.23% vs 7.71% for EET. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 8.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.23% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.27% for SPUU.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer