PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 54.14% return, which is significantly higher than SPUU's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, EET has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 11.03%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.


EET

1D
-2.52%
1M
17.51%
YTD
54.14%
6M
60.18%
1Y
118.88%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
4.07%
10Y*
11.03%

SPUU

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.01%
YTD
19.82%
6M
19.11%
1Y
53.61%
3Y*
38.21%
5Y*
20.19%
10Y*
24.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
54.14%63.14%2.88%7.06%-43.07%-10.93%18.92%31.87%-33.84%82.41%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
19.82%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and SPUU is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.66

The correlation between EET and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EET vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EET
SPUU

Financial Services

51.5%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.7%

Communication Services

-

4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.6%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Technology

-

16.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

EET
51.5%
SPUU
4.8%

Basic Materials

EET

-

SPUU
0.7%

Communication Services

EET

-

SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EET

-

SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

EET

-

SPUU
2.0%

Energy

EET

-

SPUU
1.4%

Healthcare

EET

-

SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

EET

-

SPUU
3.3%

Real Estate

EET

-

SPUU
0.8%

Technology

EET

-

SPUU
16.5%

Utilities

EET

-

SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EETSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

2.96

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.64

13.06

+3.58

EET vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is higher than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EETSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02

2.26

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.61

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Drawdowns

EET vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-59.35%

-12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.38%

-18.19%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-35.18%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.88%

-46.59%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

-59.35%

-9.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.27%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.27%

-9.51%

-27.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

4.12%

+3.05%

Volatility

EET vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) at 5.71%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

5.71%

+11.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.52%

18.09%

+16.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.66%

23.90%

+15.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.78%

33.46%

+4.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.60%

35.77%

+4.83%

EET vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

EET vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than SPUU's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.23%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and SPUU have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to SPUU (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.77% vs 11.03% for EET. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.77% return vs 11.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 1.23% for EET.

EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.64% for SPUU.

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer