PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUU vs. QLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUU vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 15.54% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 33.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 24.27%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.71% annualized return.


SPUU

1D
2.81%
1M
-4.15%
YTD
15.54%
6M
13.29%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
18.53%
10Y*
24.27%

QLD

1D
5.12%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
33.17%
6M
30.30%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
43.22%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
35.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
15.54%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
33.17%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and QLD is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.89

The correlation between SPUU and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUU vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUU
QLD

Technology

39.0%
58.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.6%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
11.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.7%

Industrials

7.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.4%

Energy

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

SPUU
39.0%
QLD
58.7%

Financial Services

SPUU
11.1%
QLD
0.2%

Communication Services

SPUU
10.6%
QLD
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
9.9%
QLD
11.4%

Healthcare

SPUU
8.3%
QLD
3.7%

Industrials

SPUU
7.8%
QLD
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
4.5%
QLD
6.4%

Energy

SPUU
3.1%
QLD
0.5%

Utilities

SPUU
2.1%
QLD
1.2%

Real Estate

SPUU
1.8%
QLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPUU
1.7%
QLD
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUU vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPUUQLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.46

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

8.22

+0.80

SPUU vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and QLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUUQLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-83.13%

+23.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-25.13%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

-42.29%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

-63.68%

+17.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

-63.68%

+4.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

-6.75%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-18.13%

+8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

7.50%

-3.16%

Volatility

SPUU vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) is 9.90%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that SPUU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUUQLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.90%

18.80%

-8.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.99%

29.45%

-9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.22%

36.15%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.69%

45.40%

-11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.76%

44.79%

-9.03%

SPUU vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUU vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.36%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPUU and QLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLD has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to SPUU (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs QLD's -83.13%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 35.71% vs 24.27% for SPUU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 35.71% return vs 24.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for QLD.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and QLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer