PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPUU vs. DDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPUU vs. DDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPUU achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly higher than DDM's 9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SPUU has outperformed DDM with an annualized return of 24.31%, while DDM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.44% annualized return.


SPUU

1D
0.60%
1M
0.07%
YTD
14.92%
6M
14.42%
1Y
45.91%
3Y*
35.91%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
24.31%

DDM

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.58%
6M
10.70%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
12.38%
10Y*
19.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPUU vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
14.92%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
9.58%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SPUU and DDM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.88

The correlation between SPUU and DDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPUU vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPUU
DDM

Technology

16.4%
17.1%

Financial Services

4.7%
27.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
11.6%

Healthcare

3.6%
13.1%

Industrials

3.2%
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.4%

Energy

1.4%
2.4%

Utilities

1.1%

-

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

0.7%
4.0%

Technology

SPUU
16.4%
DDM
17.1%

Financial Services

SPUU
4.7%
DDM
27.2%

Communication Services

SPUU
4.5%
DDM
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SPUU
4.2%
DDM
11.6%

Healthcare

SPUU
3.6%
DDM
13.1%

Industrials

SPUU
3.2%
DDM
18.4%

Consumer Defensive

SPUU
2.0%
DDM
4.4%

Energy

SPUU
1.4%
DDM
2.4%

Utilities

SPUU
1.1%
DDM

-

Real Estate

SPUU
0.8%
DDM

-

Basic Materials

SPUU
0.7%
DDM
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPUU vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPUU vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SPUUDDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

1.84

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

6.74

+4.36

SPUU vs. DDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPUU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the DDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPUU and DDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SPUUDDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.45

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.42

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.56

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.39

+0.23

Drawdowns

SPUU vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPUU drawdown since its inception was -59.35%, smaller than the maximum DDM drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPUU and DDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPUUDDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

-81.70%

+22.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

-19.31%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

-31.62%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

-40.18%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

-63.13%

+3.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-3.00%

-2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.50%

-17.32%

+7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

5.25%

-1.10%

Volatility

SPUU vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) at 6.82%. This indicates that SPUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPUUDDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

6.82%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.95%

19.03%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.47%

24.57%

-0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.54%

29.58%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.82%

34.79%

+1.03%

SPUU vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPUU has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DDM's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPUU vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison

SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than DDM's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.91%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.40%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPUU and DDM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUU has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to DDM (6.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPUU dropped -59.35% vs DDM's -81.70%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.31% vs 19.44% for DDM. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 6.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.31% return vs 19.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.91% for DDM.

SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily), while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SPUU and 0.95% for DDM.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPUU and DDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer