EET vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EET (ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EET is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EET returned 37.59%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for QTJL. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EET charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

EET vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 50.58% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.18% return.

EET

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: 9.26%
• YTD: 50.58%
• 6M: 56.34%
• 1Y: 108.31%
• 3Y*: 37.59%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EET vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	50.58%	63.14%	2.88%	7.06%	-43.07%	-19.72%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.18%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and QTJL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.61

The correlation between EET and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EET vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EET	QTJL
Financial Services	51.5%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.2%
Communication Services	-	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.6%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	54.2%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

EET vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EET

EET Risk / Return Rank: 78
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EET vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EET	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.75	2.04	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.90	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.05	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.14	16.05	-0.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EET vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EET	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.75	2.04	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.52	-0.40

Drawdowns

EET vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EET	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.66%	-33.40%	-38.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.38%	-6.68%	-19.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.89%	-22.43%	-12.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.77%	0.00%	-4.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.26%	-7.93%	-29.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.18%	1.27%	+5.91%

Volatility

EET vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 17.15% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EET	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.15%	0.30%	+16.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.62%	7.60%	+27.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.74%	9.99%	+29.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.79%	20.42%	+17.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.60%	20.42%	+20.18%

EET vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EET has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EET vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EET ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets	1.26%	1.82%	3.85%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	1.40%	0.16%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EET and QTJL in my portfolio?

EET and QTJL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EET or QTJL?

EET has higher volatility (17.15%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, EET or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, EET leads with 37.59% vs 19.18% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EET or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, EET has performed better with a 37.59% return vs 19.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EET or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EET or QTJL?

EET has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between EET and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EET and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.