QTJL vs. ALTL
QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTJL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while ALTL is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital US Large Cap Equity Rotation Index. QTJL is actively managed, while ALTL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTJL returned 9.06%/yr vs 2.71%/yr for ALTL. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QTJL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ALTL.
Performance
QTJL vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 7.55% return.
QTJL
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.33%
ALTL
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- YTD
- 7.55%
- 1Y
- 19.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.76K | $387.58K | $319.94K | |
| $200.88K | $354.66K | $247.25K |
QTJL vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 2.56% | 21.07% | 16.50% | 42.39% | -30.16% | 9.36% |
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 7.55% | 16.61% | 12.30% | -15.85% | -10.67% | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTJL and ALTL is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between QTJL and ALTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTJL vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank
QTJL
ALTL
QTJL vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QTJL | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 4.51 | +1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QTJL vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and ALTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTJL | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.40% | -31.91% | -1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -14.23% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -20.08% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | -31.91% | -1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -10.79% | +6.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -11.42% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 3.82% | -2.09% |
Volatility
QTJL vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is 6.45%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that QTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTJL | ALTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 9.45% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 17.73% | -8.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | 22.63% | -10.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.43% | 19.49% | +0.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 20.73% | -0.43% |
QTJL vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTJL vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison
QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | 0.95% | 0.95% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.06% | 0.75% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTJL and ALTL have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALTL has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs ALTL's -31.91%.
On 5-year performance, QTJL leads with 9.06% vs 2.71% for ALTL. On fees, ALTL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 2.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ALTL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.
ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
QTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ALTL is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 0.60% for ALTL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTJL and ALTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer