PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTJL vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QTJL vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTJL achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 12.29% return.


QTJL

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.97%
6M
1.77%
YTD
2.56%
1Y
11.97%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.33%

QQQM

1D
0.69%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.92%
YTD
12.29%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$962.22M$908.74M$1.19B
$200.88K$354.66K$247.25K

QTJL vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
2.56%21.07%16.50%42.39%-30.16%9.36%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
12.29%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QTJL and QQQM is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021

0.94

The correlation between QTJL and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTJL vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTJL vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTJLQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.88

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.04

6.01

+0.03

QTJL vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTJL Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTJL and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTJL vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTJL drawdown since its inception was -33.40%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTJL and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTJLQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.40%

-35.04%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-11.96%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-22.70%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-35.04%

+1.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-7.69%

+3.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-8.15%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

3.74%

-2.01%

Volatility

QTJL vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) is 6.45%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that QTJL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTJLQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

6.83%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

15.91%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

19.24%

-7.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

22.74%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

22.32%

-2.02%

QTJL vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTJL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QTJL vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.46%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%
QTJL
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QTJL and QQQM have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to QTJL (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTJL dropped -33.40% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 14.31% vs 9.06% for QTJL. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

QTJL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTJL and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTJL and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer