PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EET vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EET vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EET achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -57.36% return.


EET

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.70%
6M
9.73%
YTD
27.71%
1Y
64.20%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
4.11%

BITU

1D
2.86%
1M
5.78%
6M
-44.05%
YTD
-57.36%
1Y
-77.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-33.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$37.97M$38.90M$46.19M
$506.00K$1.40M$1.55M

EET vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
27.71%63.14%0.89%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-57.36%-37.07%41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EET and BITU is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EET vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EET
EET Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EET Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
EET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EET Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EET vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EETBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.82

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

-0.93

+3.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

-1.30

+8.14

EET vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EET Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EET and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EET vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EET drawdown since its inception was -71.66%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EET and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EETBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.66%

-83.45%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.43%

-83.45%

+56.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.80%

-80.93%

+61.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-37.68%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.42%

59.52%

-50.10%

Volatility

EET vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets (EET) has a higher volatility of 19.37% compared to Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) at 17.53%. This indicates that EET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EETBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.37%

17.53%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.06%

68.01%

-22.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.24%

88.40%

-39.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.77%

96.01%

-56.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.30%

96.01%

-54.71%

EET vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EET and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

EET vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

EET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than BITU's 80.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
80.48%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
1.57%1.82%3.85%2.14%0.00%0.00%0.01%1.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


EET and BITU have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EET has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to BITU (17.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EET dropped -71.66% vs BITU's -83.45%.

On 1-year performance, EET leads with 64.20% vs -77.50% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITU has been the lower-risk option at 17.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EET has performed better with a 64.20% return vs -77.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EET and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 80.48%, compared with 1.57% for EET.

EET is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. EET tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.

EET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EET and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer