DXD vs. NOBL
DXD (ProShares UltraShort Dow30) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXD returned -24.63%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. DXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
DXD vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXD achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, DXD has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -24.63%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.
DXD
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -9.98%
- 1Y
- -27.07%
- 3Y*
- -20.70%
- 5Y*
- -14.66%
- 10Y*
- -24.63%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
DXD vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | -9.74% | -21.11% | -16.07% | -18.77% | 7.09% | -35.18% | -44.57% | -35.33% | 3.07% | -38.64% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.51% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXD and NOBL is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | -0.87 |
The correlation between DXD and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.87 (all time) to -0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DXD vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXD
NOBL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DXD
NOBL
Basic Materials
DXD
-
NOBL
Communication Services
DXD
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DXD
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
DXD
-
NOBL
Energy
DXD
-
NOBL
Healthcare
DXD
-
NOBL
Industrials
DXD
-
NOBL
Real Estate
DXD
-
NOBL
Technology
DXD
-
NOBL
Utilities
DXD
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXD vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
DXD
NOBL
DXD vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DXD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.14 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 0.99 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 2.58 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DXD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.12 | 0.80 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.35 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.71 | 0.57 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.64 | 0.64 | -1.29 |
Drawdowns
DXD vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXD drawdown since its inception was -99.70%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXD and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.70% | -35.43% | -64.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.09% | -9.11% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.40% | -15.36% | -41.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.99% | -17.92% | -47.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.60% | -35.43% | -59.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.70% | -5.99% | -93.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.30% | -3.48% | -78.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.64% | 3.50% | +15.14% |
Volatility
DXD vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.36%. This indicates that DXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXD | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 2.36% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.80% | 8.00% | +10.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.30% | 11.33% | +12.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.49% | 14.38% | +15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 16.60% | +18.31% |
DXD vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXD vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
DXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | 4.10% | 4.25% | 5.91% | 3.87% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.76% | 1.15% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXD and NOBL have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXD has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to NOBL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXD dropped -99.70% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs -24.63% for DXD. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs -24.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DXD.
DXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.
DXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. DXD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DXD and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXD and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer