DXD vs. QLD
DXD (ProShares UltraShort Dow30) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - DXD tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXD returned -24.59%/yr vs 32.61%/yr for QLD. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
DXD vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXD achieves a -17.50% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 23.13% return. Over the past 10 years, DXD has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -24.59%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 32.61% annualized return.
DXD
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -13.18%
- YTD
- -17.50%
- 1Y
- -30.87%
- 3Y*
- -21.45%
- 5Y*
- -15.96%
- 10Y*
- -24.59%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.28%
QLD
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 47.19%
- 3Y*
- 39.28%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 32.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.17M | $10.66M | $30.46M | |
| $415.38M | $389.55M | $441.01M |
DXD vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | -17.50% | -21.11% | -16.07% | -18.77% | 7.09% | -35.18% | -44.57% | -35.33% | 3.07% | -38.64% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 23.13% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXD and QLD is -0.62, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | -0.76 |
The correlation between DXD and QLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.76 (all time) to -0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DXD vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXD
QLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DXD
QLD
Basic Materials
DXD
-
QLD
Communication Services
DXD
-
QLD
Consumer Cyclical
DXD
-
QLD
Consumer Defensive
DXD
-
QLD
Energy
DXD
-
QLD
Healthcare
DXD
-
QLD
Industrials
DXD
-
QLD
Real Estate
DXD
-
QLD
Technology
DXD
-
QLD
Utilities
DXD
-
QLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXD vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
DXD
QLD
DXD vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.22 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.04 | 1.89 | -2.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.82 | 5.56 | -7.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXD vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXD drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXD and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.72% | -83.13% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.66% | -25.13% | -4.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.24% | -42.29% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.27% | -63.68% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.36% | -63.68% | -30.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.72% | -13.78% | -85.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.43% | -18.10% | -64.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.31% | 8.51% | +9.80% |
Volatility
DXD vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) is 7.70%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 13.87%. This indicates that DXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXD | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.70% | 13.87% | -6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.02% | 32.06% | -12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.16% | 38.59% | -13.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.62% | 45.80% | -16.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 45.00% | -10.07% |
DXD vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DXD and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
DXD vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
DXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | 4.12% | 4.25% | 5.91% | 3.87% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.76% | 1.15% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXD and QLD have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to DXD (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXD dropped -99.72% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 32.61% vs -24.59% for DXD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, DXD has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 32.61% return vs -24.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DXD and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
DXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.
DXD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXD and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer