DXD vs. XLG
DXD (ProShares UltraShort Dow30) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXD returned -25.22%/yr vs 17.16%/yr for XLG. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. DXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
DXD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXD achieves a -13.17% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, DXD has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of -25.22%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.16% annualized return.
DXD
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- -13.17%
- 6M
- -11.92%
- 1Y
- -31.21%
- 3Y*
- -21.91%
- 5Y*
- -16.12%
- 10Y*
- -25.22%
XLG
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -3.59%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 23.61%
- 3Y*
- 22.12%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
DXD vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | -13.17% | -21.11% | -16.07% | -18.77% | 7.09% | -35.18% | -44.57% | -35.33% | 3.07% | -38.64% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 3.55% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXD and XLG is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | -0.87 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DXD and XLG has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.87 to -0.66, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
DXD vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXD
XLG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DXD
XLG
Basic Materials
DXD
-
XLG
Communication Services
DXD
-
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
DXD
-
XLG
Consumer Defensive
DXD
-
XLG
Energy
DXD
-
XLG
Healthcare
DXD
-
XLG
Industrials
DXD
-
XLG
Real Estate
DXD
-
XLG
-
Technology
DXD
-
XLG
Utilities
DXD
-
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXD vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
DXD
XLG
DXD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.31 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 1.91 | -2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 6.89 | -8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXD drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXD and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.71% | -52.39% | -47.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.90% | -12.41% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.68% | -20.70% | -36.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.02% | -28.02% | -38.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.76% | -30.46% | -64.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -5.13% | -94.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.33% | -7.63% | -74.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.75% | 3.44% | +16.31% |
Volatility
DXD vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.74%. This indicates that DXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.34% | 4.74% | +3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.74% | 10.60% | +9.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.98% | 13.86% | +11.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 18.77% | +10.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.98% | 18.89% | +16.09% |
DXD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
DXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than XLG's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | 4.26% | 4.25% | 5.91% | 3.87% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.76% | 1.15% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXD and XLG have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXD has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to XLG (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXD dropped -99.71% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.16% vs -25.22% for DXD. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.16% return vs -25.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DXD.
DXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.82% for XLG.
DXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. DXD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DXD and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXD and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer