DXD vs. XLG
DXD (ProShares UltraShort Dow30) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DXD returned -24.58%/yr vs 16.35%/yr for XLG. Their -0.87 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
DXD vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DXD achieves a -15.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 2.89% return. Over the past 10 years, DXD has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of -24.58%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.35% annualized return.
DXD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- -15.18%
- 1Y
- -28.93%
- 3Y*
- -19.87%
- 5Y*
- -15.36%
- 10Y*
- -24.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.18%
XLG
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 15.84%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 16.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.42M | $10.89M | $30.28M | |
| $61.04M | $60.71M | $102.52M |
DXD vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | -15.18% | -21.11% | -16.07% | -18.77% | 7.09% | -35.18% | -44.57% | -35.33% | 3.07% | -38.64% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 2.89% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DXD and XLG is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | -0.87 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between DXD and XLG has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.87 to -0.66, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
DXD vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DXD
XLG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DXD
XLG
Basic Materials
DXD
-
XLG
Communication Services
DXD
-
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
DXD
-
XLG
Consumer Defensive
DXD
-
XLG
Energy
DXD
-
XLG
Healthcare
DXD
-
XLG
Industrials
DXD
-
XLG
Real Estate
DXD
-
XLG
-
Technology
DXD
-
XLG
Utilities
DXD
-
XLG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DXD vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
DXD
XLG
DXD vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.17 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.10 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 3.41 | -4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DXD vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DXD drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than XLG's maximum drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DXD and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.72% | -52.39% | -47.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -12.41% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.14% | -20.70% | -38.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.19% | -28.02% | -39.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.35% | -30.46% | -63.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -5.74% | -93.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.43% | -7.62% | -74.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.20% | 3.98% | +14.22% |
Volatility
DXD vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Dow30 (DXD) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 5.03%. This indicates that DXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DXD | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 5.03% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.86% | 11.54% | +8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 14.75% | +10.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 18.89% | +10.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.91% | 18.92% | +15.99% |
DXD vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DXD vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
DXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than XLG's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXD ProShares UltraShort Dow30 | 4.01% | 4.25% | 5.91% | 3.87% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.76% | 1.15% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.65% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DXD and XLG have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXD has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to XLG (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DXD dropped -99.72% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.35% vs -24.58% for DXD. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.35% return vs -24.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DXD.
DXD has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 0.65% for XLG.
DXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. DXD tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (-200%), while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DXD and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DXD and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer