DRUP vs. SPYG
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRUP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 8.53%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
DRUP vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
DRUP vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -10.33% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.72% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and SPYG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and SPYG has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DRUP vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
SPYG
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
SPYG
Healthcare
DRUP
SPYG
Communication Services
DRUP
SPYG
Financial Services
DRUP
SPYG
Industrials
DRUP
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
SPYG
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
SPYG
Energy
DRUP
-
SPYG
Real Estate
DRUP
-
SPYG
Utilities
DRUP
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
SPYG
DRUP vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRUP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 1.96 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 7.79 | -7.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -67.63% | +36.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -13.76% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -22.14% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -32.67% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -5.52% | -7.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -24.28% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 3.46% | +6.09% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.26%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 7.26% | +1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 13.90% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 17.26% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 21.36% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 20.73% | +2.49% |
DRUP vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and SPYG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRUP has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to SPYG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.11% vs 8.53% for DRUP. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer