PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRUP vs. IWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRUP vs. IWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than IWL's 10.03% return.


DRUP

1D
-2.27%
1M
9.28%
YTD
-3.24%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*

IWL

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.18%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.03%
1Y
28.50%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
14.59%
10Y*
16.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRUP vs. IWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
-3.24%18.18%23.11%42.32%-28.18%26.13%28.71%11.32%
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
10.03%19.09%27.12%29.77%-19.89%27.79%22.10%10.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DRUP and IWL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019

0.90

The correlation between DRUP and IWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRUP vs. IWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRUP
IWL

Technology

55.8%
40.9%

Healthcare

20.8%
8.5%

Communication Services

19.8%
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
9.6%

Financial Services

1.2%
11.3%

Industrials

1.1%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Technology

DRUP
55.8%
IWL
40.9%

Healthcare

DRUP
20.8%
IWL
8.5%

Communication Services

DRUP
19.8%
IWL
12.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DRUP
1.3%
IWL
9.6%

Financial Services

DRUP
1.2%
IWL
11.3%

Industrials

DRUP
1.1%
IWL
6.1%

Basic Materials

DRUP

-

IWL
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

DRUP

-

IWL
4.7%

Energy

DRUP

-

IWL
2.5%

Real Estate

DRUP

-

IWL
1.0%

Utilities

DRUP

-

IWL
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRUP vs. IWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRUP
DRUP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DRUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRUP Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DRUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRUP Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IWL
IWL Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWL Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRUP vs. IWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRUPIWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.42

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

2.91

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

12.92

-12.00

DRUP vs. IWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRUP Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the IWL Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRUP and IWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRUPIWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.35

-1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.85

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.88

-0.21

Drawdowns

DRUP vs. IWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum IWL drawdown of -32.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and IWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRUPIWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.29%

-32.71%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-9.83%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.77%

-19.15%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.29%

-25.65%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-0.83%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.41%

-3.88%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

2.21%

+7.04%

Volatility

DRUP vs. IWL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) at 2.98%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRUPIWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

2.98%

+4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.17%

9.15%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.55%

12.19%

+7.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

17.17%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.23%

18.08%

+5.15%

DRUP vs. IWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IWL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRUP vs. IWL - Dividend Comparison

DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRUP
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.40%0.51%0.28%0.53%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
0.82%0.90%1.04%1.30%1.54%1.12%1.30%1.96%1.93%1.69%1.96%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRUP and IWL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to IWL (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs IWL's -32.71%.

On 5-year performance, IWL leads with 14.59% vs 10.93% for DRUP. On fees, IWL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IWL has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWL has performed better with a 14.59% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.

IWL has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.

DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IWL tracks Russell Top 200 Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.15% for IWL.

IWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRUP and IWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer