DRUP vs. ARKK
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRUP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ARKK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by ARK. DRUP is passively managed, while ARKK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 9.37%/yr vs -9.65%/yr for ARKK. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKK.
Performance
DRUP vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's -7.38% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.16%
ARKK
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -12.32%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -7.38%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.25%
- 5Y*
- -9.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $356.24M | $389.65M | $523.48M | |
| $66.56K | $69.04K | $115.65K |
DRUP vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -2.96% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.72% |
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | -7.38% | 35.49% | 8.40% | 69.04% | -66.97% | -23.60% | 152.71% | 19.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and ARKK is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.72 |
The correlation between DRUP and ARKK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
DRUP vs. ARKK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
ARKK
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRUP
ARKK
Healthcare
DRUP
ARKK
Communication Services
DRUP
ARKK
Industrials
DRUP
ARKK
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
ARKK
Real Estate
DRUP
ARKK
-
Financial Services
DRUP
ARKK
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
ARKK
-
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
ARKK
-
Energy
DRUP
-
ARKK
-
Utilities
DRUP
-
ARKK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
ARKK
DRUP vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRUP | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.01 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.17 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | -0.35 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -80.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and ARKK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -80.97% | +49.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -31.35% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -39.56% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -76.27% | +44.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -53.87% | +48.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -30.38% | +21.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 15.57% | -5.61% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 4.69%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | ARKK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 10.19% | -5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 27.72% | -11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 36.83% | -16.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 46.55% | -24.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 40.48% | -17.34% |
DRUP vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison
Neither DRUP nor ARKK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKK ARK Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.55% | 1.64% | 0.38% | 3.14% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and ARKK have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKK has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to DRUP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs ARKK's -80.97%.
On 5-year performance, DRUP leads with 9.37% vs -9.65% for ARKK. On fees, DRUP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 9.37% return vs -9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRUP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKK.
DRUP and ARKK have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DRUP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.75% for ARKK.
DRUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and ARKK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer