DRUP vs. GARP
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - DRUP tracks the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 10.93%/yr vs 20.26%/yr for GARP. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
DRUP vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 21.29% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 21.29%
- 6M
- 21.80%
- 1Y
- 43.57%
- 3Y*
- 33.60%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- —
DRUP vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 24.42% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 21.29% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and GARP is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DRUP and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DRUP vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
GARP
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
GARP
Healthcare
DRUP
GARP
Communication Services
DRUP
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
GARP
Financial Services
DRUP
GARP
Industrials
DRUP
GARP
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
GARP
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
GARP
-
Energy
DRUP
-
GARP
Real Estate
DRUP
-
GARP
Utilities
DRUP
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
GARP
DRUP vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRUP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | 2.45 | -2.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 3.18 | -2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.41 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 3.20 | -2.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 12.85 | -11.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRUP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 2.45 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.93 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.90 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -31.34% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -13.69% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -23.73% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -30.61% | -0.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.73% | -5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -7.36% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 3.40% | +5.85% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 5.03%. This indicates that DRUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 5.03% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 13.89% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 17.89% | +1.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 21.97% | -0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 23.89% | -0.66% |
DRUP vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and GARP have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRUP has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to GARP (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 20.26% vs 10.93% for DRUP. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 20.26% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer